Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 553 primary output with 67.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 33.1 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas | 11 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 61.8 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas | 11 | 35 | 351 | 1 | 61.8 |
| 2016 Postseason | Arkansas State | 12 | 5 | 127 | 3 | 69.4 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Arkansas State | 12 | 33 | 426 | 4 | 69.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Arkansas State paired 553 primary output with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas, Arkansas State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
46.1
Efficiency
67.2
Usage
18.3
Consistency
49.4
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 127. Toledo: 3. Utah State: 35. Central Arkansas: 49. Georgia Southern: 52. South Alabama: 2. UL Monroe: 22. Georgia State: 42. New Mexico State: 101. Troy: 31. Louisiana: 90. Texas State: -1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 5 by 100. Toledo: 1 by 20. Utah State: 4 by 58.3. Central Arkansas: 2 by 100. Georgia Southern: 3 by 100. South Alabama: 1 by 13.3. UL Monroe: 2 by 73.3. Georgia State: 2 by 100. New Mexico State: 6 by 100. Troy: 5 by 41.3. Louisiana: 6 by 100. Texas State: 1 by 0
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.