Player Stats

Travis Wilson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
8,628
Passing yards
7,403
Rushing yards
1,225
Touchdowns
75

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonUtah121,3511,311401147.2
2013 Regular SeasonUtah92,2131,8273862166.2
2014 PostseasonUtah1324915891469.4
2014 Regular SeasonUtah132,2302,0122181969.4
2015 PostseasonUtah12947123176.5
2015 Regular SeasonUtah122,4912,0244671976.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Utah paired 2,585 primary output with 62 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 62 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: USC

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Utah

Games

12

Primary Metric / G

215.4

Efficiency

62

Usage

28.3

Consistency

81.2

Best Game by takeover score

USC

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 94. Michigan: 261. Utah State: 125. Oregon: 327. California: 219. Arizona State: 251. USC: 289. Oregon State: 254. Washington: 197. Arizona: 251. UCLA: 177. Colorado: 140

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 31 by 52.1. Michigan: 45 by 64. Utah State: 17 by 81.4. Oregon: 36 by 80.8. California: 38 by 56.5. Arizona State: 46 by 60.2. USC: 49 by 52. Oregon State: 31 by 79.9. Washington: 35 by 56.4. Arizona: 43 by 59.3. UCLA: 44 by 55.6. Colorado: 39 by 45.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins207.6 · Games = 9 · -31.4 vs Losses
Losses239 · Games = 3 · +31.4 vs Wins