Usage Score
28.3
Player Dossier
2012-2015Utah
Travis Wilson
QB • 6'7" • San Clemente, CA, USA
Pass-first distributorVolume operator
Travis Wilson is a pass-first distributor with 28.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
62
Consistency
81.2
Season Value
67.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Utah
121314141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Utah
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Travis Wilson, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Utah. Travis Wilson is a pass-first distributor with 28.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Utah paired 2,585 primary output with 62 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 62 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Utah
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
215.4
Efficiency
62
Usage
28.3
Consistency
81.2
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 94. Michigan: 261. Utah State: 125. Oregon: 327. California: 219. Arizona State: 251. USC: 289. Oregon State: 254. Washington: 197. Arizona: 251. UCLA: 177. Colorado: 140
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 31 by 52.1. Michigan: 45 by 64. Utah State: 17 by 81.4. Oregon: 36 by 80.8. California: 38 by 56.5. Arizona State: 46 by 60.2. USC: 49 by 52. Oregon State: 31 by 79.9. Washington: 35 by 56.4. Arizona: 43 by 59.3. UCLA: 44 by 55.6. Colorado: 39 by 45.6
Split Comparison
Wins207.6 · n=9 · -31.4 vs Losses
Losses239 · n=3 · +31.4 vs Wins
First Half212.8 · n=6 · -5.2 vs Second Half
Second Half218 · n=6 · +5.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
81.4 vs Utah State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | vs BYU | W 35-28 | 9 | 16 | 71 | 56.3 | 0 | 0 | 52.1 | 15 | 23 | 1.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Colorado | W 20-14 | 10 | 26 | 108 | 38.5 | 1 | 1 | 45.6 | 13 | 32 | 2.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs UCLADual-threat | L 9-17 | 13 | 26 | 110 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 55.6 | 18 | 67 | 3.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Arizona | L 30-37 | 20 | 31 | 219 | 64.5 | 2 | 1 | 59.3 | 12 | 32 | 2.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Washington | W 34-23 | 12 | 25 | 155 | 48.0 | 0 | 1 | 56.4 | 10 | 42 | 4.20 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Oregon StateDual-threat | W 27-12 | 14 | 17 | 198 | 82.4 | 1 | 0 | 79.9 | 14 | 56 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ USC | L 24-42 | 24 | 36 | 254 | 66.7 | 2 | 4 | 52 | 13 | 35 | 2.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Arizona State | W 34-18 | 26 | 36 | 297 | 72.2 | 2 | 0 | 60.2 | 10 | -46 | -4.60 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs California | W 30-24 | 16 | 26 | 170 | 61.5 | 1 | 2 | 56.5 | 12 | 49 | 4.10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 9/27 | @ Oregon3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 62-20 | 18 | 30 | 227 | 60.0 | 4 | 0 | 80.8 | 6 | 100 | 16.70 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Utah State | W 24-14 | 9 | 12 | 76 | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | 81.4 | 5 | 49 | 9.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Fri 9/4 | vs MichiganDual-threat | W 24-17 | 24 | 33 | 210 | 72.7 | 0 | 1 | 64 | 12 | 51 | 4.30 | 1 | 14 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Utah
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Utah | 1,351 | 53.7 | 14.9 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Utah | 2,213 | 55.2 | 23.1 | 862 |
| 2014 Postseason | Utah | 2,479 | 58 | 21.4 | 266 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah | 2,479 | 58 | 21.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Utah | 2,585 | 62 | 28.3 | 106 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah | 2,585 | 62 | 28.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
421
Primary metric
421 total offense with 72.9 efficiency.
#2
Oregon
327
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
327 total offense with 80.8 efficiency.
#3
Oregon State
254
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
254 total offense with 79.9 efficiency.
#4
USC
289
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
289 total offense with 52 efficiency.
#5
Unknown
357
Primary metric
Game with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
357 total offense with 93.4 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Utah
2,585 primary output · 62 efficiency · 28.3 usage
67.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Utah
67.9
2,585 primary · 62 efficiency · 28.3 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Utah
63.6
2,479 primary · 58 efficiency · 21.4 usage
Milestones
16
250+ passing yards
7
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
22
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9043
San Clemente · San Clemente, CA
- Committed To
- Utah
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
8,628
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.