Player Stats

Chase Hansen College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
255
TFL
32
Sacks
7
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
15
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonUtah00-0--0-
2013 Regular SeasonUtah00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonUtah00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonUtah20-0--050
2016 PostseasonUtah134-0-3065.7
2016 Regular SeasonUtah13867.5126265.7
2017 Regular SeasonUtah8512.5122046.5
2018 Regular SeasonUtah1211422514281.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season

Utah paired 34 primary output with 65.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 65.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Utah

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

2.8

Efficiency

65.6

Usage

18.7

Consistency

60

Best Game by takeover score

Northern Illinois

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Weber State: 2. Northern Illinois: 6.5. Washington: 1.5. Washington State: 2. Stanford: 3. Arizona: 2. USC: 4. UCLA: 3. Arizona State: 1.5. Oregon: 4.5. BYU: 4. Washington: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Weber State: 4 by 36.7. Northern Illinois: 12 by 100. Washington: 11 by 60.8. Washington State: 7 by 49.2. Stanford: 9 by 67.5. Arizona: 9 by 57.5. USC: 11 by 85.8. UCLA: 5 by 50.8. Arizona State: 7 by 44.2. Oregon: 13 by 95. BYU: 13 by 90. Washington: 13 by 50

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.6 · Games = 8 · +2.4 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 4 · -2.4 vs Wins