Usage Score
18.9
Player Dossier
2012-2016USC
Darreus Rogers
WR • 6'2" • Compton, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Darreus Rogers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.2
Consistency
65.1
Season Value
65.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · USC
121313141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- USC
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Darreus Rogers, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · USC. Darreus Rogers reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
USC paired 696 primary output with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · USC
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
53.5
Efficiency
78.2
Usage
18.9
Consistency
65.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 42. Alabama: 45. Utah State: 82. Stanford: 26. Utah: 58. Arizona State: 28. Colorado: 76. Arizona: 42. California: 97. Oregon: 33. Washington: 84. UCLA: 34. Notre Dame: 49
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 5 by 56. Alabama: 2 by 100. Utah State: 7 by 78.1. Stanford: 4 by 43.3. Utah: 5 by 77.3. Arizona State: 1 by 100. Colorado: 4 by 100. Arizona: 5 by 56. California: 6 by 100. Oregon: 4 by 55. Washington: 6 by 93.3. UCLA: 3 by 75.6. Notre Dame: 4 by 81.7
Split Comparison
Wins56.7 · n=10 · +13.7 vs Losses
Losses43 · n=3 · -13.7 vs Wins
First Half51 · n=7 · -5.5 vs Second Half
Second Half56.5 · n=6 · +5.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs California
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | @ Penn State | W 52-49 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 45-27 | — | 4 | 49 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ UCLA | W 36-14 | — | 3 | 34 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Washington | W 26-13 | — | 6 | 84 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Oregon | W 45-20 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 10/28 | vs California2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 6 | 97 | 16.2 | 16.20 | 2 | 36 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Arizona | W 48-14 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Colorado | W 21-17 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 46 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona State | W 41-20 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Utah | L 27-31 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Stanford | L 10-27 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Utah State | W 45-7 | — | 7 | 82 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Alabama | L 6-52 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 36 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
USC
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132013201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | USC | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Postseason | USC | 257 | 71.4 | 12.7 | 257 |
| 2013 Regular Season | USC | 257 | 71.4 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | USC | 245 | 69 | 8.3 | -12 |
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 245 | 69 | 8.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | USC | 289 | 73.1 | 12.2 | 44 |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 289 | 73.1 | 12.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | USC | 696 | 78.2 | 18.9 | 407 |
| 2016 Regular Season | USC | 696 | 78.2 | 18.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97
Primary metric
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 82.7 efficiency score.
#3
Washington
84
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Colorado
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Fresno State
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · USC
696 primary output · 78.2 efficiency · 18.9 usage
65.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · USC
65.6
696 primary · 78.2 efficiency · 18.9 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · USC
51
289 primary · 73.1 efficiency · 12.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.9533
Carson · Carson, CA
- Committed To
- USC
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,487
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.