Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
USC paired 33 primary output with 41.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Jahleel Pinner College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 64
- Rushing yards
- 6
- Receiving yards
- 58
- Touchdowns
- 2
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | USC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | USC | 7 | 33 | 0 | 33 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2014 Regular Season | USC | 2 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 33.3 |
| 2015 Postseason | USC | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | USC | 5 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 30.2 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 28.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Idaho
Win with 17 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · USC
Games
5
Scrimmage Yards / G
4.4
Efficiency
28.1
Usage
1.8
Consistency
20.9
Best Game by takeover score
Idaho
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 0. Idaho: 17. Colorado: 4. Oregon: 0. Stanford: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 1 by 0. Idaho: 2 by 70.8. Colorado: 1 by 33.3. Stanford: 1 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins10.5 · Games = 2 · +10.2 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · -10.2 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jahleel Pinner
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.