Usage Score
10.7
Player Dossier
2012-2016UCLA
Kenneth Walker
WR • 5'9" • Richmond, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Kenneth Walker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.9
Consistency
30.5
Season Value
53.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · UCLA
12121314151516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- UCLA
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kenneth Walker, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · UCLA. Kenneth Walker reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
UCLA paired 127 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
36.5
Efficiency
76.9
Usage
10.7
Consistency
30.5
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 115. UNLV: 7. BYU: 25. Stanford: 38. Arizona: 114. Arizona State: 25. Washington State: 20. Utah: 14. Oregon State: 0. California: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 6 by 100. UNLV: 1 by 46.7. BYU: 2 by 83.3. Stanford: 2 by 100. Arizona: 4 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 55.6. Washington State: 2 by 66.7. Utah: 1 by 93.3. California: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Wins36.5 · n=4 · +0 vs Losses
Losses36.5 · n=6 · +0 vs Wins
First Half59.8 · n=5 · +46.6 vs Second Half
Second Half13.2 · n=5 · -46.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Texas A&M
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ California | L 10-36 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 7 |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Oregon State | W 38-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Utah | L 45-52 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Washington State | L 21-27 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Arizona State | L 20-23 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 10/2 | vs Arizona100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 4 | 114 | 24.4 | 28.50 | 2 | 62 |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Stanford | L 13-22 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ BYU | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs UNLV | W 42-21 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Texas A&M100 receiving yards | L 24-31 | — | 6 | 115 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 1 | 62 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UCLA
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2012201220132014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | UCLA | 59 | 35.4 | 7.5 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | UCLA | 59 | 35.4 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UCLA | 0 | — | — | -59 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UCLA | 127 | 100 | 5 | 127 |
| 2015 Postseason | UCLA | 231 | 84.8 | 6.1 | 104 |
| 2015 Regular Season | UCLA | 231 | 84.8 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | UCLA | 365 | 76.9 | 10.7 | 134 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas A&M
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115
Primary metric
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
88
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
88 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Washington
65
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
65 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Memphis
62
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
62 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · UCLA
127 primary output · 100 efficiency · 5 usage
59.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · UCLA
53.6
365 primary · 76.9 efficiency · 10.7 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · UCLA
45.4
231 primary · 84.8 efficiency · 6.1 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2021 · Rating 0.8478
Richmond · Rockingham, NC
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2021
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
782
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.