Player Stats

Bralon Addison College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,937
Receptions
146
Touchdowns
26

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2012 PostseasonOregon11-0041.5
2012 Regular SeasonOregon1122243341.5
2013 PostseasonOregon13548079.5
2013 Regular SeasonOregon1356842979.5
2014 Regular SeasonOregon0-00-
2015 PostseasonOregon13529079.8
2015 Regular SeasonOregon13587751479.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Oregon paired 804 primary output with 73.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 73.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Oregon

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

61.8

Efficiency

73.1

Usage

27.6

Consistency

63.7

Best Game by takeover score

Michigan State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. TCU: 29. Eastern Washington: 24. Michigan State: 138. Georgia State: 23. Utah: 31. Colorado: 9. Washington State: 62. Washington: 78. Arizona State: 88. California: 79. Stanford: 32. USC: 105. Oregon State: 106

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 5 by 38.7. Eastern Washington: 3 by 53.3. Michigan State: 7 by 100. Georgia State: 3 by 51.1. Utah: 3 by 68.9. Colorado: 2 by 30. Washington State: 8 by 51.7. Washington: 5 by 100. Arizona State: 6 by 97.8. California: 5 by 100. Stanford: 3 by 71.1. USC: 5 by 100. Oregon State: 8 by 88.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins60.4 · Games = 9 · -4.6 vs Losses
Losses65 · Games = 4 · +4.6 vs Wins