Usage / Role
13%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2015Navy
FB • 6'1" • Walkersville, MD, USA
Quentin Ezell leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.1 efficiency.
Usage / Role
13%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
4
Developing production for a back
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
13
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Navy
Snapshot
Player Story
Quentin Ezell built his college career from 2012 through 2015 as a FB from Walkersville, MD wearing No. 32, spending time with Navy. The clearest part of Quentin Ezell's career was his backfield work: 374 rushing...
Read the storyQuentin Ezell, FB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Postseason · Navy. Quentin Ezell leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.1 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | Navy | 4 | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 19.6 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Navy | 3 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 32.7 |
| 2015 Postseason | Navy | 13 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 53.5 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Navy | 13 | 309 | 309 | 0 | 6 | 53.5 |
Related Context
Quentin Ezell played FB for Navy. Across 4 tracked seasons, Quentin Ezell recorded 374 rushing yards and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Navy.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Navy paired 317 primary output with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 45.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
24.4
Efficiency
45.1
Usage
7.7
Consistency
46.6
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 8. Colgate: 44. East Carolina: 45. UConn: 33. Air Force: 7. Notre Dame: 75. Tulane: 11. South Florida: 19. Memphis: 28. SMU: 33. Tulsa: 8. Houston: 2. Army: 4
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 4 by 20.8. Colgate: 6 by 76.4. East Carolina: 9 by 52.1. UConn: 9 by 38.2. Air Force: 3 by 24.3. Notre Dame: 6 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 38.2. South Florida: 3 by 66. Memphis: 6 by 48.6. SMU: 7 by 49.1. Tulsa: 2 by 41.7. Houston: 2 by 10.4. Army: 2 by 20.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | vs Pittsburgh | W 44-28 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 12/12 | vs Army | W 21-17 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Houston | L 31-52 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ Tulsa | W 44-21 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 1 | — | — | 4 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs SMU | W 55-14 | 7 | 33 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Memphis | W 45-20 | 6 | 28 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs South Florida | W 29-17 | 3 | 19 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Tulane | W 31-14 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 1 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Notre Dame2+ TD | L 24-41 | 6 | 75 | 12.50 | 2 | — | — | 12.5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Air Force | W 33-11 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ UConn | W 28-18 | 9 | 33 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs East Carolina | W 45-21 | 9 | 45 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Colgate2+ TD | W 48-10 | 6 | 44 | 7.30 | 2 | — | — | 7.3 |
Player Story
Quentin Ezell built his college career from 2012 through 2015 as a FB from Walkersville, MD wearing No. 32, spending time with Navy. The clearest part of Quentin Ezell's career was his backfield work: 374 rushing yards, 74 carries, and 6 rushing touchdowns across 20 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2015 with Navy. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 7 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 20 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Navy.
The arc is straightforward: Quentin Ezell moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Navy
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Navy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Navy | 28 | 43 | 2.3 | 28 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Navy | 29 | 47.5 | 3.5 | 1 |
| 2015 Postseason | Navy | 317 | 45.1 | 7.7 | 288 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Navy | 317 | 45.1 | 7.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Notre Dame
Week 6 · L 24-41
Loss with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
75
Scrimmage Yards
77.6 takeover
75 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#2
vs Delaware
Week 3 · W 51-7
23
Scrimmage Yards
58.6 takeover
Win with 23 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
23 scrimmage yards and 5.6 usage.
#3
vs Ohio State
Week 1 · L 17-34
17
Scrimmage Yards
57.4 takeover
Loss with 17 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
17 scrimmage yards and 4.6 usage.
#4
vs Colgate
Week 1 · W 48-10
44
Scrimmage Yards
56.5 takeover
Win with 44 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
44 scrimmage yards and 12 usage.
#5
vs East Carolina
Week 3 · W 45-21 · Conference game
45
Scrimmage Yards
48.3 takeover
Win with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
45 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2015 Postseason · Navy
317 primary output · 45.1 efficiency · 7.7 usage
53.5
#2
2015 Regular Season · Navy
53.5
317 primary · 45.1 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Navy
32.7
29 primary · 47.5 efficiency · 3.5 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
2
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.