Player Dossier

2012-2015

Duke

Shaquille Powell

RB • 5'10" • Las Vegas, NV, USA

Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover

Shaquille Powell leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.2 efficiency.

Usage Score

20.2

Efficiency

45.2

Consistency

62.9

Season Value

57.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Duke

12131314141515

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Duke
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Shaquille Powell, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · Duke. Shaquille Powell leans balanced backfield option traits and 45.2 efficiency.

Shaquille Powell played RB for Duke. Across 4 tracked seasons, Shaquille Powell recorded 1,597 rushing yards, 460 receiving yards, and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Duke.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Duke paired 772 primary output with 53 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina

Loss with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Postseason · Duke

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

58

Efficiency

45.2

Usage

20.2

Consistency

62.9

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Indiana: 25. Tulane: 44. Unknown: 92. Northwestern: 110. Georgia Tech: 94. Boston College: 18. Army: 52. Virginia Tech: 15. Miami: 55. North Carolina: 129. Pittsburgh: 59. Virginia: 14. Wake Forest: 47

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Indiana: 6 by 34. Tulane: 10 by 39.8. Unknown: 19 by 47.9. Northwestern: 16 by 78. Georgia Tech: 16 by 63.8. Boston College: 14 by 13.4. Army: 12 by 41.5. Virginia Tech: 7 by 22.3. Miami: 14 by 37.6. North Carolina: 16 by 80.7. Pittsburgh: 11 by 48.4. Virginia: 3 by 48.6. Wake Forest: 16 by 31.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins42.1 · Games = 7 · -31.3 vs Losses
Losses73.4 · Games = 5 · +31.3 vs Wins
First Half62.1 · Games = 7 · +9.0 vs Second Half
Second Half53.2 · Games = 6 · -9.0 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Scrimmage Yards

Top game by takeover score

North Carolina

Best efficiency game

80.7 vs North Carolina

Result
Sat 12/26vs IndianaW 44-41382.7003174.2
Sat 11/28@ Wake ForestW 27-2115463.100112.9
Sat 11/21@ VirginiaL 34-423144.7004.7
Sat 11/14vs PittsburghL 13-316254.2005345.4
Sat 11/7@ North CarolinaL 31-6613987.5003318.1
Sat 10/31vs MiamiL 27-3010343.4004213.9
Sat 10/24@ Virginia TechW 45-437152.1002.1
Sat 10/10@ ArmyW 44-38303.8004224.3
Sat 10/3vs Boston CollegeW 9-714181.3001.3
Sat 9/26vs Georgia Tech2+ TDW 34-2014886.303265.9
Sat 9/19vs NorthwesternL 10-199717.9007396.9
Sat 9/12vs Unknown16714.4003214.8
Fri 9/4@ TulaneW 37-77243.4003204.4

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Duke

    2012-2015

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2012201320132014201420152015
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2012 Regular SeasonDuke9735.37.5
2013 PostseasonDuke43457.410337
2013 Regular SeasonDuke43457.4100
2014 PostseasonDuke7725322.2338
2014 Regular SeasonDuke7725322.20
2015 PostseasonDuke75445.220.2-18
2015 Regular SeasonDuke75445.220.20

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

North Carolina

Loss with 129 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

129

Primary metric

129 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.

#2

Miami

82

Primary metric

Win with 82 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

82 scrimmage yards and 13.4 usage.

#3

Arizona State

169

Primary metric

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.

169 scrimmage yards and 52.5 usage.

#4

Northwestern

110

Primary metric

Loss with 110 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

110 scrimmage yards and 27.1 usage.

#5

Georgia Tech

94

Primary metric

Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.

94 scrimmage yards and 31.4 usage.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2014 Postseason · Duke

772 primary output · 53 efficiency · 22.2 usage

61.3

#2

2014 Regular Season · Duke

61.3

772 primary · 53 efficiency · 22.2 usage

#3

2015 Postseason · Duke

57.1

754 primary · 45.2 efficiency · 20.2 usage

Milestones

3

100+ rush yards

1

150+ scrimmage yards

2

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2012 · Rating 0.8837

Bishop Gorman · Las Vegas, NV

Committed To
Duke
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2012

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

2,057

Career Scrimmage Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.