Player Stats

DeVon Edwards College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
29
TFL
3
Sacks
3
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
1
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonDuke00-0--0-
2013 PostseasonDuke100-0--015.3
2013 Regular SeasonDuke100-0--415.3
2014 PostseasonDuke110-0--05.3
2014 Regular SeasonDuke110-0--15.3
2015 PostseasonDuke120-0--05.2
2015 Regular SeasonDuke120-0--35.2
2016 Regular SeasonDuke4293321075.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season

Duke paired 9 primary output with 51.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 51.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Regular Season · Duke

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

2.3

Efficiency

51.7

Usage

11.2

Consistency

56.9

Best Game by takeover score

Northwestern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. North Carolina Central: 1. Wake Forest: 4. Northwestern: 4. Notre Dame: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina Central: 3 by 22.5. Wake Forest: 13 by 90. Northwestern: 12 by 90. Notre Dame: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.5 · Games = 2 · -3.5 vs Losses
Losses4 · Games = 2 · +3.5 vs Wins