Usage Score
13.4
Player Dossier
2012-2015Pittsburgh
TE • 6'4" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA
J.P. Holtz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.4
Efficiency
87.3
Consistency
72.3
Season Value
67.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
J.P. Holtz, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. J.P. Holtz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
J.P. Holtz played TE for Pittsburgh. Across 4 tracked seasons, J.P. Holtz recorded 931 receiving yards and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Pittsburgh.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 350 primary output with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 87.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
31.8
Efficiency
87.3
Usage
13.4
Consistency
72.3
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 42. Iowa: 37. Virginia Tech: 23. Virginia: 36. Georgia Tech: 38. Syracuse: 14. North Carolina: 49. Notre Dame: 58. Duke: 31. Louisville: 12. Miami: 10
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 3 by 93.3. Iowa: 3 by 82.2. Virginia Tech: 1 by 100. Virginia: 2 by 100. Georgia Tech: 3 by 84.4. Syracuse: 1 by 93.3. North Carolina: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 3 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Louisville: 2 by 40. Miami: 1 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs Miami | L 24-29 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Louisville | W 45-34 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Duke | W 31-13 | — | 2 | 31 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Notre Dame | L 30-42 | — | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Thu 10/29 | vs North Carolina | L 19-26 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Syracuse | W 23-20 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Georgia Tech | W 31-28 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Virginia | W 26-19 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Virginia Tech | W 17-13 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ Iowa | L 24-27 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Akron | W 24-7 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Pittsburgh
2012-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 173 | 80 | 9.5 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 173 | 80 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 209 | 60.9 | 12.6 | 36 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 209 | 60.9 | 12.6 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Pittsburgh | 199 | 67.3 | 18.5 | -10 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 199 | 67.3 | 18.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 350 | 87.3 | 13.4 | 151 |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Notre Dame
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rutgers
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Carolina
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
350 primary output · 87.3 efficiency · 13.4 usage
67.9
#2
2014 Postseason · Pittsburgh
52.7
199 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 18.5 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
52.7
199 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 18.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8877
Shaler Area · Pittsburgh, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
931
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.