Player Dossier

2012-2015

Pittsburgh

J.P. Holtz

TE • 6'4" • Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

J.P. Holtz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

13.4

Efficiency

87.3

Consistency

72.3

Season Value

67.9

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

12121313141415

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Pittsburgh
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

J.P. Holtz, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. J.P. Holtz reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

J.P. Holtz played TE for Pittsburgh. Across 4 tracked seasons, J.P. Holtz recorded 931 receiving yards and 11 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Pittsburgh.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Pittsburgh paired 350 primary output with 87.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 87.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

Games

11

Receiving Yards / G

31.8

Efficiency

87.3

Usage

13.4

Consistency

72.3

Best Game by takeover score

Miami

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Akron: 42. Iowa: 37. Virginia Tech: 23. Virginia: 36. Georgia Tech: 38. Syracuse: 14. North Carolina: 49. Notre Dame: 58. Duke: 31. Louisville: 12. Miami: 10

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Akron: 3 by 93.3. Iowa: 3 by 82.2. Virginia Tech: 1 by 100. Virginia: 2 by 100. Georgia Tech: 3 by 84.4. Syracuse: 1 by 93.3. North Carolina: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 3 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Louisville: 2 by 40. Miami: 1 by 66.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins28 · Games = 7 · -10.5 vs Losses
Losses38.5 · Games = 4 · +10.5 vs Wins
First Half31.7 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half32 · Games = 5 · +0.3 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Notre Dame

Best efficiency game

100 vs Duke

Result
Fri 11/27vs MiamiL 24-291101010010
Sat 11/21vs LouisvilleW 45-342126607
Sat 11/14@ DukeW 31-1323115.515.50128
Sat 11/7vs Notre DameL 30-4235819.319.30027
Thu 10/29vs North CarolinaL 19-2634916.316.30020
Sat 10/24@ SyracuseW 23-201141414014
Sat 10/17@ Georgia TechW 31-2833812.712.70120
Sat 10/10vs VirginiaW 26-192361818028
Sat 10/3@ Virginia TechW 17-131232323123
Sun 9/20@ IowaL 24-2733712.312.30019
Sat 9/12@ AkronW 24-73421414125

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Pittsburgh

    2012-2015

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2012201220132013201420142015
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2012 PostseasonPittsburgh173809.5
2012 Regular SeasonPittsburgh173809.50
2013 PostseasonPittsburgh20960.912.636
2013 Regular SeasonPittsburgh20960.912.60
2014 PostseasonPittsburgh19967.318.5-10
2014 Regular SeasonPittsburgh19967.318.50
2015 Regular SeasonPittsburgh35087.313.4151

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Notre Dame

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

58

Primary metric

58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Notre Dame

54

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Rutgers

45

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

North Carolina

49

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

Virginia

40

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

40 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2015 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

350 primary output · 87.3 efficiency · 13.4 usage

67.9

#2

2014 Postseason · Pittsburgh

52.7

199 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 18.5 usage

#3

2014 Regular Season · Pittsburgh

52.7

199 primary · 67.3 efficiency · 18.5 usage

Milestones

0

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2012 · Rating 0.8877

Shaler Area · Pittsburgh, PA

Committed To
Pittsburgh
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2012

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

931

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.