Player Stats

DeAngelo Brown College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
40
TFL
12.5
Sacks
3
QB hurries
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonLouisville00-0--0-
2013 Regular SeasonLouisville00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonLouisville00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonLouisville00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonLouisville11520--060.2
2016 Regular SeasonLouisville113510.531-060.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Louisville paired 16.5 primary output with 30.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 30.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wake Forest

Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Louisville

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

1.5

Efficiency

30.2

Usage

7

Consistency

52.4

Best Game by takeover score

Wake Forest

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. LSU: 2. Syracuse: 2. Florida State: 4. Marshall: 0. Clemson: 0. Duke: 0.5. NC State: 0. Boston College: 2. Wake Forest: 4. Houston: 2. Kentucky: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 5 by 40.8. Syracuse: 3 by 32.5. Florida State: 4 by 56.7. Marshall: 1 by 4.2. Clemson: 2 by 8.3. Duke: 6 by 30. NC State: 4 by 16.7. Boston College: 2 by 28.3. Wake Forest: 6 by 65. Houston: 6 by 45. Kentucky: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.8 · Games = 7 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · -0.8 vs Wins