Usage Score
13.6
Player Dossier
2012-2016Wake Forest
WR • 6'3" • St. John's, FL, USA
Jared Crump reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.6
Efficiency
60.3
Consistency
56.9
Season Value
55.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jared Crump, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Jared Crump reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jared Crump played WR for Wake Forest. Across 5 tracked seasons, Jared Crump recorded 24 passing yards, 2 rushing yards, and 515 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2014 with Wake Forest.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 339 primary output with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 60.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
28.3
Efficiency
60.3
Usage
13.6
Consistency
56.9
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UL Monroe: 8. Unknown: 59. Utah State: 48. Army: 57. Louisville: 24. Florida State: 0. Syracuse: 9. Boston College: 60. Clemson: 9. NC State: 35. Virginia Tech: 3. Duke: 27
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UL Monroe: 2 by 26.7. Unknown: 6 by 65.6. Utah State: 4 by 80. Army: 4 by 95. Louisville: 2 by 80. Florida State: 1 by 0. Syracuse: 2 by 30. Boston College: 6 by 66.7. Clemson: 1 by 60. NC State: 2 by 100. Virginia Tech: 1 by 20. Duke: 1 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
100 vs Duke
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/30 | @ Duke | L 21-41 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Virginia Tech | W 6-3 | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ NC State | L 13-42 | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 0 | 28 |
| Fri 11/7 | vs Clemson | L 20-34 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Boston College | L 17-23 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Syracuse | L 7-30 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Florida State | L 3-43 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Louisville | L 10-20 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Army | W 24-21 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Utah State | L 24-36 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 8/28 | @ UL Monroe | L 10-17 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 176 | 68.3 | 10.2 | 176 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 339 | 60.3 | 13.6 | 163 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | -339 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Army
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
57
Primary metric
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#3
Boston College
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#4
Miami
37
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
59
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 65.6 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
339 primary output · 60.3 efficiency · 13.6 usage
55.8
#2
2013 Regular Season · Wake Forest
47.3
176 primary · 68.3 efficiency · 10.2 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Wake Forest
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8189
Bartram Trail · Jacksonville, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
515
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.