Usage Score
6.7
Player Dossier
2012-2016Wake Forest
Josh Banks
DL • 6'4" • Cary, NC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Josh Banks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.8
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
20.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
121314151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Wake Forest
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Josh Banks, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Josh Banks shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Wake Forest
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
21.8
Usage
6.7
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 4. Duke: 0. Unknown: 1. Indiana: 1. NC State: 0. Syracuse: 1. Florida State: 0. Army: 0. Virginia: 5.5. Louisville: 0. Clemson: 0. Boston College: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 2 by 48.3. Duke: 1 by 4.2. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Indiana: 3 by 22.5. NC State: 3 by 12.5. Syracuse: 4 by 26.7. Florida State: 3 by 12.5. Army: 3 by 12.5. Virginia: 6 by 75. Louisville: 3 by 12.5. Clemson: 3 by 12.5. Boston College: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins2.3 · Games = 5 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 6 · -2.3 vs Wins
First Half1.2 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · Games = 6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
75 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | vs Temple2+ sacks · Splash game | W 34-26 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Boston College | L 14-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/20 | vs Clemson | L 13-35 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Louisville | L 12-44 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Virginia2+ sacks · Splash game | W 27-20 | 6 | 2 | — | 3.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Army | L 13-21 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Florida State | L 6-17 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Syracuse | W 28-9 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ NC State | L 16-33 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Indiana | W 33-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Duke | W 24-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Wake Forest
2012-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201220132014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Wake Forest | 12.5 | 21.8 | 6.7 | 12.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 12.5 | 21.8 | 6.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Virginia
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 67 takeover score.
#2
Utah State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Temple
4
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
#4
Syracuse
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 17 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 16.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Wake Forest
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41
#2
2016 Postseason · Wake Forest
20.1
12.5 primary · 21.8 efficiency · 6.7 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Wake Forest
20.1
12.5 primary · 21.8 efficiency · 6.7 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8219
Middle Creek · Apex, NC
- Committed To
- Wake Forest
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
34
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.