Player Stats

Antonio Crawford College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
24
TFL
2
Passes defended
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonMiami00-0--0-
2013 Regular SeasonMiami10-0--044.2
2014 Regular SeasonMiami00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonWest Virginia00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonWest Virginia84-0--052.9
2016 Regular SeasonWest Virginia82020-6052.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

West Virginia paired 8 primary output with 22.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 22.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, West Virginia.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Youngstown State

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · West Virginia

Games

8

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

22.5

Usage

4.2

Consistency

54.2

Best Game by takeover score

Youngstown State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 0. Missouri: 1. Youngstown State: 3. BYU: 1. Texas Tech: 0. TCU: 2. Oklahoma State: 0. Baylor: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 4 by 16.7. Missouri: 8 by 43.3. Youngstown State: 3 by 42.5. BYU: 3 by 22.5. Texas Tech: 1 by 4.2. TCU: 2 by 28.3. Oklahoma State: 2 by 8.3. Baylor: 1 by 14.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 6 · +1.3 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · -1.3 vs Wins