Player Stats

Xion Chapman College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
14
TFL
3
Sacks
2
Passes defended
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2025 PostseasonFlorida International9211--047
2025 Regular SeasonFlorida International91221-1047

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason

Florida International paired 6 primary output with 13.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 13.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Western Kentucky

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Postseason · Florida International

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

13.2

Usage

4.6

Consistency

36.1

Best Game by takeover score

Western Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UTSA: 2. Bethune-Cookman: 0.5. Penn State: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0.5. UConn: 0. Western Kentucky: 2. Kennesaw State: 0. Liberty: 1. Jacksonville State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTSA: 2 by 28.3. Bethune-Cookman: 2 by 13.3. Penn State: 1 by 4.2. Florida Atlantic: 3 by 17.5. UConn: 1 by 4.2. Western Kentucky: 3 by 32.5. Kennesaw State: 1 by 4.2. Liberty: 0 by 10. Jacksonville State: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 5 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 4 · -0.3 vs Wins