Usage Score
4.7
Player Dossier
2025-2025Washington State
Sullivan Schlimgen
LB • 6'1" • 220 lbs • Sioux Falls, SD, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Sullivan Schlimgen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.9 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.9
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
9.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington State
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sullivan Schlimgen, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Washington State. Sullivan Schlimgen shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.9 disruption score.
Sullivan Schlimgen played LB for Washington State. Across 1 tracked season, Sullivan Schlimgen recorded 49 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Washington State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Washington State paired 1.5 primary output with 21.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Washington State
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.1
Efficiency
21.9
Usage
4.7
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 0.5. North Texas: 0. Colorado State: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Virginia: 0. Toledo: 0. Oregon State: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. James Madison: 0. Oregon State: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 6 by 30. North Texas: 4 by 16.7. Colorado State: 3 by 12.5. Ole Miss: 9 by 37.5. Virginia: 5 by 20.8. Toledo: 4 by 16.7. Oregon State: 8 by 43.3. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 20.8. James Madison: 2 by 8.3. Oregon State: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.1 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Wins
First Half0.1 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.2 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
43.3 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/22 | @ Utah State | W 34-21 | 6 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Oregon State | W 32-8 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | @ James Madison | L 20-24 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 28-3 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Oregon State | L 7-10 | 8 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Toledo | W 28-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Virginia | L 20-22 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Ole Miss | L 21-24 | 9 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Colorado State | W 20-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ North Texas | L 10-59 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Washington State | 1.5 | 21.9 | 4.7 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Washington State | 1.5 | 21.9 | 4.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 51.3 takeover score.
#2
Utah State
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 30.1 takeover score.
#3
Ole Miss
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 14.4 takeover score.
#4
Louisiana Tech
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.4 takeover score.
#5
Virginia
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 8.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Washington State
1.5 primary output · 21.9 efficiency · 4.7 usage
9.2
#2
2025 Regular Season · Washington State
9.2
1.5 primary · 21.9 efficiency · 4.7 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8575
O'Gorman · Sioux Falls, SD
- Committed To
- Washington State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
49
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 10 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.