Usage Score
22.4
Player Dossier
2024-2025Kent State
Dashawn Martin
WR • 6'0" • 170 lbs • Springfield, OH, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Dashawn Martin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.1
Consistency
61.7
Season Value
65.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Kent State
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Kent State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dashawn Martin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Kent State. Dashawn Martin reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Dashawn Martin played WR for Kent State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Dashawn Martin recorded 615 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 4 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Kent State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Kent State paired 507 primary output with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Kent State
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
46.1
Efficiency
78.1
Usage
22.4
Consistency
61.7
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 6. Buffalo: 17. Florida State: 94. Oklahoma: 34. Massachusetts: 42. Toledo: 16. Bowling Green: 48. Ball State: 36. Akron: 71. Central Michigan: 52. Northern Illinois: 91
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 1 by 40. Buffalo: 2 by 56.7. Florida State: 3 by 100. Oklahoma: 2 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 93.3. Toledo: 3 by 35.6. Bowling Green: 6 by 53.3. Ball State: 3 by 80. Akron: 4 by 100. Central Michigan: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins63 · Games = 4 · +26.6 vs Losses
Losses36.4 · Games = 7 · -26.6 vs Wins
First Half34.8 · Games = 6 · -24.8 vs Second Half
Second Half59.6 · Games = 5 · +24.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | @ Northern Illinois | W 35-31 | — | 3 | 91 | 30.3 | 30.30 | 1 | 59 |
| Thu 11/20 | vs Central Michigan | L 16-28 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 23 |
| Wed 11/12 | @ Akron | W 42-35 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 27 |
| Thu 11/6 | @ Ball State | L 13-17 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Bowling Green | W 24-21 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Toledo | L 10-45 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Massachusetts | W 42-6 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Oklahoma | L 0-44 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Florida State | L 10-66 | — | 3 | 94 | 31.3 | 31.30 | 1 | 75 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Buffalo | L 28-31 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Texas Tech | L 14-62 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Kent State
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Kent State | 108 | 77.3 | 11.3 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Kent State | 507 | 78.1 | 22.4 | 399 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91
Primary metric
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida State
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
52
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
52 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Kent State
507 primary output · 78.1 efficiency · 22.4 usage
65.3
#2
2024 Regular Season · Kent State
37.4
108 primary · 77.3 efficiency · 11.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8304
Springfield · Springfield, OH
- Committed To
- Kent State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
615
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 20 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.