Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2025-2025UTEP
RB • 5'9" • 190 lbs • Midland, TX, USA
Elijah McCoy leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.4 efficiency.
Usage / Role
6%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
5
Developing production for a back
Reliability
5
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
17
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Elijah McCoy, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · UTEP. Elijah McCoy leans balanced backfield option traits and 33.4 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 50 | 47 | 3 | 0 | 50.9 |
Related Context
Elijah McCoy played RB for UTEP. Across 1 tracked season, Elijah McCoy recorded 47 rushing yards and 3 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UTEP paired 50 primary output with 33.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 33.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Loss with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Scrimmage Yards / G
8.3
Efficiency
33.4
Usage
5.6
Consistency
54.4
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Liberty: 10. Sam Houston: 11. Jacksonville State: 6. Missouri State: 0. New Mexico State: 21. Delaware: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Liberty: 4 by 26. Sam Houston: 1 by 95.8. Jacksonville State: 3 by 20.8. Missouri State: 1 by 0. New Mexico State: 4 by 54.7. Delaware: 3 by 2.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
95.8 vs Sam Houston
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | UTEP | 50 | 33.4 | 5.6 | — |
#1 Featured game
vs No. 123 New Mexico State
Week 13 · L 31-34 · Conference game
Loss with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21
Scrimmage Yards
59.2 takeover
21 scrimmage yards and 8 usage.
#2
@ No. 135 Sam Houston
Week 8 · W 35-17 · Conference game
11
Scrimmage Yards
51.1 takeover
Win with 11 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
11 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#3
vs No. 102 Liberty
Week 7 · L 8-19 · Conference game
10
Scrimmage Yards
34.5 takeover
Loss with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
10 scrimmage yards and 10.5 usage.
#4
vs No. 92 Jacksonville State
Week 11 · L 27-30 · Conference game
6
Scrimmage Yards
21.9 takeover
Loss with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 5.7 usage.
#5
@ No. 109 Delaware
Week 14 · L 31-61 · Conference game
2
Scrimmage Yards
9.2 takeover
Loss with 2 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
2 scrimmage yards and 5.4 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · UTEP
50 primary output · 33.4 efficiency · 5.6 usage
50.9
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.