Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2024-2025Navy
MarcAnthony Parker
LB • 6'0" • 218 lbs • Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
MarcAnthony Parker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
41.2
Consistency
55.5
Season Value
51.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Navy
242525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Navy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
MarcAnthony Parker, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Postseason · Navy. MarcAnthony Parker shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 41.2 disruption score.
MarcAnthony Parker played LB for Navy. Across 2 tracked seasons, MarcAnthony Parker recorded 105 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Navy.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Navy paired 13.5 primary output with 41.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 41.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Navy
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
41.2
Usage
11
Consistency
55.5
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 1. VMI: 2. UAB: 1.5. Tulsa: 2.5. Rice: 3. Air Force: 1. Temple: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. North Texas: 0.5. Notre Dame: 0. South Florida: 1. Memphis: 1. Army: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 4 by 26.7. VMI: 5 by 40.8. UAB: 4 by 31.7. Tulsa: 11 by 70.8. Rice: 13 by 80. Air Force: 7 by 39.2. Temple: 12 by 50. Florida Atlantic: 7 by 29.2. North Texas: 9 by 42.5. Notre Dame: 2 by 8.3. South Florida: 10 by 51.7. Memphis: 8 by 43.3. Army: 5 by 20.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.2 · Games = 11 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 2 · -0.9 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
80 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ Cincinnati | W 35-13 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/13 | vs Army | W 17-16 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/28 | @ Memphis | W 28-17 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs South Florida10+ tackles | W 41-38 | 10 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Notre Dame | L 10-49 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ North Texas | L 17-31 | 9 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 42-32 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Temple10+ tackles | W 32-31 | 12 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Air Force | W 34-31 | 7 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Rice10+ tackles · Splash game | W 21-13 | 13 | 6 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Tulsa10+ tackles · Splash game | W 42-23 | 11 | 7 | — | 2 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UAB | W 38-24 | 4 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs VMISplash game | W 52-7 | 5 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Navy
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
202420252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Navy | 4 | 14.7 | 6.2 | — |
| 2025 Postseason | Navy | 13.5 | 41.2 | 11 | 9.5 |
| 2025 Regular Season | Navy | 13.5 | 41.2 | 11 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 66.3 takeover score.
#2
Tulsa
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 58.3 takeover score.
#3
East Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.2 takeover score.
#4
South Florida
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.7 takeover score.
#5
VMI
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Postseason · Navy
13.5 primary output · 41.2 efficiency · 11 usage
51.9
#2
2025 Regular Season · Navy
51.9
13.5 primary · 41.2 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2024 Regular Season · Navy
16
4 primary · 14.7 efficiency · 6.2 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
5
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
105
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring MarcAnthony Parker
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.