Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2025-2025TCU
Jon Denman
RB • 5'10" • 195 lbs • Palestine, TX, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jon Denman leans balanced backfield option traits and 31.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
31.8
Consistency
57.9
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jon Denman, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · TCU. Jon Denman leans balanced backfield option traits and 31.8 efficiency.
Jon Denman played RB for TCU. Across 1 tracked season, Jon Denman recorded 178 rushing yards, 6 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2025 with TCU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
TCU paired 184 primary output with 31.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 31.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Loss with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · TCU
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
20.4
Efficiency
31.8
Usage
10.1
Consistency
57.9
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 35. North Carolina: 26. Unknown: 12. SMU: 0. Arizona State: 0. Colorado: 0. BYU: 45. Houston: 37. Cincinnati: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 8 by 50.5. North Carolina: 7 by 38.7. Unknown: 4 by 33.3. SMU: 5 by 0. Colorado: 1 by 0. BYU: 7 by 67. Houston: 11 by 35. Cincinnati: 10 by 30.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins21.2 · Games = 6 · -1.3 vs Losses
Losses22.5 · Games = 2 · +1.3 vs Wins
First Half14.6 · Games = 5 · -13.2 vs Second Half
Second Half27.8 · Games = 4 · +13.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
67 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs USC | W 30-27 | 6 | 31 | 5.20 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4.4 |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Cincinnati | W 45-23 | 10 | 29 | 2.90 | 0 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Houston | W 17-14 | 11 | 37 | 3.40 | 0 | — | — | 3.4 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ BYU | L 13-44 | 7 | 45 | 6.40 | 1 | — | — | 6.4 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Colorado | W 35-21 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Arizona State | L 24-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs SMU | W 35-24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Tue 9/2 | @ North Carolina | W 48-14 | 7 | 26 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | TCU | 184 | 31.8 | 10.1 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | TCU | 184 | 31.8 | 10.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
BYU
Loss with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
45
Primary metric
45 scrimmage yards and 15.9 usage.
#2
USC
35
Primary metric
Win with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 13.3 usage.
#3
Houston
37
Primary metric
Win with 37 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
37 scrimmage yards and 18.3 usage.
#4
Cincinnati
29
Primary metric
Win with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
29 scrimmage yards and 14.1 usage.
#5
North Carolina
26
Primary metric
Win with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
26 scrimmage yards and 11.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · TCU
184 primary output · 31.8 efficiency · 10.1 usage
50
#2
2025 Regular Season · TCU
50
184 primary · 31.8 efficiency · 10.1 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8633
Westwood · Palestine, TX
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
184
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 9 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.