Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2025-2025Stanford
Liam Thorpe
WR • 6'0" • 195 lbs • New York, NY, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Liam Thorpe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
100
Season Value
100
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Stanford
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Liam Thorpe, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Stanford. Liam Thorpe reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Liam Thorpe is listed as a WR for Stanford. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Stanford paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with — efficiency.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Stanford
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 0. Boston College: 0. SMU: 0. Florida State: 0. Pittsburgh: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
— vs Pittsburgh
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0
Primary metric
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#2
Florida State
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#3
SMU
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
0
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
#5
BYU
0
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
0 receiving yards with a — efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Stanford
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8583
Hun School · Princeton, NJ
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.