Usage Score
19.1
Player Dossier
2025-2025Eastern Michigan
Harold Mack
WR • 5'11" • 158 lbs • Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Harold Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.1
Consistency
35.7
Season Value
57.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
25
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Harold Mack, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Harold Mack reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 333 primary output with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
66.6
Efficiency
77.1
Usage
19.1
Consistency
35.7
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami (OH): 179. Ohio: 36. Bowling Green: 21. Ball State: 33. Western Michigan: 64
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami (OH): 6 by 100. Ohio: 3 by 80. Bowling Green: 3 by 46.7. Ball State: 3 by 73.3. Western Michigan: 5 by 85.3
Split Comparison
Wins27 · n=2 · -66 vs Losses
Losses93 · n=3 · +66 vs Wins
First Half78.7 · n=3 · +30.2 vs Second Half
Second Half48.5 · n=2 · -30.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Miami (OH)
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
2025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 333 | 77.1 | 19.1 | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Miami (OH)
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
179
Primary metric
179 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
64
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 85.3 efficiency score.
#3
Ohio
36
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
Ball State
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
21
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
333 primary output · 77.1 efficiency · 19.1 usage
57.2
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.8667
Wayne · Fort Wayne, IN
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
333
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.