Usage Score
12.2
Player Dossier
2025-2025SMU
Jalen Cooper
WR • 6'2" • 180 lbs • Cibolo, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jalen Cooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.4
Consistency
61.1
Season Value
65.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jalen Cooper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · SMU. Jalen Cooper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
SMU paired 321 primary output with 88.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 88.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · SMU
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
45.9
Efficiency
88.4
Usage
12.2
Consistency
61.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 41. Unknown: 73. Baylor: 89. Missouri State: 68. TCU: 13. Syracuse: 28. California: 9
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 3 by 91.1. Unknown: 5 by 97.3. Baylor: 2 by 100. Missouri State: 5 by 90.7. TCU: 1 by 86.7. Syracuse: 2 by 93.3. California: 1 by 60
Split Comparison
Wins45.7 · n=3 · +8.7 vs Losses
Losses37 · n=3 · -8.7 vs Wins
First Half67.8 · n=4 · +51.1 vs Second Half
Second Half16.7 · n=3 · -51.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
100 vs Baylor
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | SMU | 321 | 88.4 | 12.2 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | SMU | 321 | 88.4 | 12.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
89
Primary metric
89 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Unknown
73
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#3
Missouri State
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#5
Syracuse
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · SMU
321 primary output · 88.4 efficiency · 12.2 usage
65.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · SMU
65.4
321 primary · 88.4 efficiency · 12.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.935
Steele · Cibolo, TX
- Committed To
- SMU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
321
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 7 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.