Usage Score
28.3
Player Dossier
2011-2013Fresno State
Davante Adams
WR • 6'2" • Palo Alto, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Davante Adams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.2
Consistency
59.7
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Fresno State
1112121313
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Davante Adams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Fresno State. Davante Adams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Fresno State paired 1,312 primary output with 81.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: San José State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Fresno State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
132.2
Efficiency
69.2
Usage
28.3
Consistency
59.7
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 73. Rutgers: 148. Unknown: 31. Boise State: 110. Hawai'i: 22. Idaho: 185. UNLV: 221. San Diego State: 87. Nevada: 84. Wyoming: 79. New Mexico: 246. San José State: 264. Utah State: 168
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 9 by 54.1. Rutgers: 14 by 70.5. Unknown: 5 by 41.3. Boise State: 12 by 61.1. Hawai'i: 5 by 29.3. Idaho: 16 by 77.1. UNLV: 8 by 100. San Diego State: 12 by 48.3. Nevada: 8 by 70. Wyoming: 11 by 47.9. New Mexico: 9 by 100. San José State: 13 by 100. Utah State: 9 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins135 · n=10 · -33.5 vs Losses
Losses168.5 · n=2 · +33.5 vs Wins
First Half112.9 · n=7 · -41.8 vs Second Half
Second Half154.7 · n=6 · +41.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
San José State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/21 | @ USCHigh volume | L 20-45 | — | 9 | 73 | 8.1 | 8.10 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 12/8 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-17 | — | 9 | 168 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 1 | 68 |
| Fri 11/29 | @ San José State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 52-62 | — | 13 | 264 | 20.3 | 20.30 | 3 | 46 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs New Mexico100 receiving yards · High volume | W 69-28 | — | 9 | 246 | 27.3 | 27.30 | 4 | 59 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ WyomingHigh volume | W 48-10 | — | 11 | 79 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 1 | 15 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs NevadaHigh volume | W 41-23 | — | 8 | 84 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 28 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ San Diego StateHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 35-28 | — | 12 | 87 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 2 | 16 |
| Sun 10/20 | vs UNLV100 receiving yards · High volume | W 38-14 | — | 8 | 221 | 27.6 | 27.60 | 4 | 75 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Idaho100 receiving yards · High volume | W 61-14 | — | 16 | 185 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 3 | 30 |
| Sun 9/29 | @ Hawai'i | W 42-37 | — | 5 | 22 | 4.4 | 4.40 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Boise State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-40 | — | 12 | 110 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 1 | 22 |
| Sun 9/8 | vs Unknown | — | — | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 1 | 9 |
| Fri 8/30 | vs Rutgers100 receiving yards · High volume | W 52-51 | — | 14 | 148 | 10.6 | 10.60 | 2 | 27 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Fresno State
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Fresno State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Fresno State | 1,312 | 81.3 | 29.8 | 1,312 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Fresno State | 1,312 | 81.3 | 29.8 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Fresno State | 1,718 | 69.2 | 28.3 | 406 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Fresno State | 1,718 | 69.2 | 28.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
San José State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
264
Primary metric
264 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
New Mexico
198
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
198 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico
246
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
246 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UNLV
221
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
221 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Nevada
120
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
120 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Fresno State
1,312 primary output · 81.3 efficiency · 29.8 usage
65.7
#2
2012 Regular Season · Fresno State
65.7
1,312 primary · 81.3 efficiency · 29.8 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Fresno State
64.3
1,718 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 28.3 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
18
8+ catch outings
10
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7333
Palo Alto · Palo Alto, CA
- Committed To
- Fresno State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
3,030
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.