Player Stats

Ya'Keem Griner College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
590
Receptions
53
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonFlorida International0-00-
2012 Regular SeasonFlorida International69113044.2
2013 Regular SeasonFlorida International814158253.1
2014 Regular SeasonFlorida International5994050.1
2015 Regular SeasonFlorida International621225270.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Florida International paired 225 primary output with 64.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 64.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisiana Tech

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Florida International

Games

6

Receiving Yards / G

37.5

Efficiency

64.9

Usage

14.4

Consistency

68.5

Best Game by takeover score

Louisiana Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 55. Indiana: 11. North Carolina Central: 55. Louisiana Tech: 64. UTEP: 36. Middle Tennessee: 4

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 4 by 91.7. Indiana: 2 by 36.7. North Carolina Central: 5 by 73.3. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 61. UTEP: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 26.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins48.7 · Games = 3 · +22.3 vs Losses
Losses26.3 · Games = 3 · -22.3 vs Wins