Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2025-2025Texas
Graceson Littleton
DB • 6'0" • 180 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Graceson Littleton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
23.2
Consistency
35.1
Season Value
22.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas
2525
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Graceson Littleton, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason · Texas. Graceson Littleton shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.2 disruption score.
Graceson Littleton played DB for Texas. Across 1 tracked season, Graceson Littleton recorded 46 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with Texas.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Postseason
Texas paired 11 primary output with 23.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 23.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Postseason · Texas
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
23.2
Usage
5
Consistency
35.1
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 1. Ohio State: 1. San José State: 0. UTEP: 1. Sam Houston: 0. Florida: 0. Oklahoma: 2. Kentucky: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Vanderbilt: 0. Georgia: 2. Arkansas: 3.5. Texas A&M: 0.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 6 by 35. Ohio State: 1 by 14.2. San José State: 3 by 12.5. UTEP: 2 by 18.3. Sam Houston: 2 by 8.3. Florida: 8 by 33.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 24.2. Kentucky: 4 by 16.7. Mississippi State: 7 by 29.2. Vanderbilt: 3 by 12.5. Georgia: 2 by 28.3. Arkansas: 3 by 47.5. Texas A&M: 4 by 21.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.8 · Games = 10 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
47.5 vs Arkansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/31 | vs Michigan | W 41-27 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/29 | vs Texas A&M | W 27-17 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Arkansas | W 52-37 | 3 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sun 11/16 | @ GeorgiaSplash game | L 10-35 | 2 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Vanderbilt | W 34-31 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Mississippi State | W 45-38 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Kentucky | W 16-13 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Oklahoma | W 23-6 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Florida | L 21-29 | 8 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Sam Houston | W 55-0 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs UTEP | W 27-10 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs San José State | W 38-7 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Ohio State | L 7-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas
2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20252025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 Postseason | Texas | 11 | 23.2 | 5 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Texas | 11 | 23.2 | 5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 51.6 takeover score.
#2
Georgia
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 32.3 takeover score.
#3
Oklahoma
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 28.8 takeover score.
#4
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 22.7 takeover score.
#5
UTEP
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 18.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Postseason · Texas
11 primary output · 23.2 efficiency · 5 usage
22.5
#2
2025 Regular Season · Texas
22.5
11 primary · 23.2 efficiency · 5 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2025 · Rating 0.9672
Wiregrass Ranch · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2025
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
46
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 13 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.