Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2024-2025UAB
DE • 6'3" • 260 lbs • Leeds, AL, USA
Chris Burge shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.8 disruption score.
Usage Score
8.7
Efficiency
25.8
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
36.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Burge, DE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2025 Regular Season · UAB. Chris Burge shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.8 disruption score.
Chris Burge played DE for UAB. Across 2 tracked seasons, Chris Burge recorded 33 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2025 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
UAB paired 15.5 primary output with 25.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 25.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2025 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Win with 5.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
25.8
Usage
8.7
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama State: 2. Navy: 0. Akron: 4. Tennessee: 0. Army: 0. Florida Atlantic: 1. Memphis: 3. UConn: 0. Rice: 0. North Texas: 0. Tulsa: 5.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama State: 4 by 36.7. Navy: 5 by 20.8. Akron: 7 by 69.2. Tennessee: 1 by 4.2. Army: 2 by 8.3. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 18.3. Memphis: 1 by 34.2. UConn: 1 by 4.2. Rice: 2 by 8.3. North Texas: 2 by 8.3. Tulsa: 5 by 70.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ TulsaSplash game | W 31-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs North Texas | L 24-53 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 17-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ UConn | L 19-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs MemphisSplash game | W 31-24 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 33-53 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Army | L 13-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Tennessee | L 24-56 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/14 | vs AkronSplash game | W 31-28 | 7 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Navy | L 24-38 | 5 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Alabama StateSplash game | W 52-42 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | UAB | 0 | 4.2 | 0.6 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | UAB | 15.5 | 25.8 | 8.7 | 15.5 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with 5.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
5.5
Primary metric
5.5 disruption/tackle impact with 64.2 takeover score.
#2
Akron
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 53 takeover score.
#3
Memphis
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 35.4 takeover score.
#4
Alabama State
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 29.6 takeover score.
#5
Florida Atlantic
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 16.9 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2025 Regular Season · UAB
15.5 primary output · 25.8 efficiency · 8.7 usage
36.6
#2
2024 Regular Season · UAB
34.9
0 primary · 4.2 efficiency · 0.6 usage
1
Impact games
4
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8083
Leeds · Leeds, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
33
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 12 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.