Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2024-2025Iowa State
Dominic Overby
WR • 6'5" • 200 lbs • West Jordan, UT, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Dominic Overby reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.4
Consistency
79.7
Season Value
65.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Iowa State
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Iowa State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dominic Overby, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season · Iowa State. Dominic Overby reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season
Iowa State paired 87 primary output with 76.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Iowa State
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
21.8
Efficiency
76.4
Usage
9.3
Consistency
79.7
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 29. Iowa: 9. Arkansas State: 27. Cincinnati: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 2 by 96.7. Iowa: 1 by 60. Arkansas State: 1 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Wins21.7 · n=3
First Half19 · n=2 · -5.5 vs Second Half
Second Half24.5 · n=2 · +5.5 vs First Half
All Games21.8 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kansas State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arkansas State
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Iowa State
2024-2025
Opening stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Iowa State | 9 | 60 | 4.2 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Iowa State | 87 | 76.4 | 9.3 | 78 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kansas State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29
Primary metric
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas State
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Kansas
9
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
#4
Cincinnati
22
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
22 receiving yards with a 48.9 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2025 Regular Season · Iowa State
87 primary output · 76.4 efficiency · 9.3 usage
65.5
#2
2024 Regular Season · Iowa State
43.6
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 4.2 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8784
West Jordan · West Jordan, UT
- Committed To
- Iowa State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
96
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 5 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.