Player Stats

Ashten Emory College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
707
Rushing yards
592
Receiving yards
115
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2024 Regular SeasonUTEP1352312044.6
2025 Regular SeasonUTEP12672569103662.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2025 Regular Season

UTEP paired 672 primary output with 42.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2025 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2025 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State

Loss with 192 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2025 Regular Season · UTEP

Games

12

Scrimmage Yards / G

56

Efficiency

42.3

Usage

22.4

Consistency

42.1

Best Game by takeover score

New Mexico State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 40. UT Martin: 56. Texas: 17. UL Monroe: 19. Louisiana Tech: 60. Liberty: 0. Sam Houston: 118. Kennesaw State: 36. Jacksonville State: 42. Missouri State: 55. New Mexico State: 192. Delaware: 37

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 7 by 56.1. UT Martin: 12 by 41.9. Texas: 15 by 7.6. UL Monroe: 6 by 33. Louisiana Tech: 12 by 49.2. Liberty: 1 by 0. Sam Houston: 17 by 68.9. Kennesaw State: 12 by 31.3. Jacksonville State: 11 by 39. Missouri State: 9 by 63.7. New Mexico State: 20 by 90. Delaware: 13 by 27

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins87 · Games = 2 · +37.2 vs Losses
Losses49.8 · Games = 10 · -37.2 vs Wins