Usage Score
21.6
Player Dossier
2024-2025Colorado
Joseph Williams
WR • 6'2" • 200 lbs • Arlington, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Joseph Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.9
Consistency
65.1
Season Value
61.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Tulsa
2425
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Tulsa • Colorado
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joseph Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season · Tulsa. Joseph Williams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Joseph Williams played WR for Tulsa and Colorado. Across 2 tracked seasons, Joseph Williams recorded 6 rushing yards, 1,077 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2024 with Tulsa.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2024 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 588 primary output with 94.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2025 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2025 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Colorado.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2025 Regular Season · Colorado
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
48.9
Efficiency
77.9
Usage
21.6
Consistency
65.1
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia Tech: 10. Delaware: 55. Houston: 52. Wyoming: 47. BYU: 56. TCU: 22. Iowa State: 128. Arizona: 16. West Virginia: 64. Arizona State: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia Tech: 1 by 66.7. Delaware: 4 by 91.7. Houston: 3 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 100. BYU: 5 by 74.7. TCU: 2 by 73.3. Iowa State: 8 by 100. Arizona: 3 by 35.6. West Virginia: 3 by 100. Arizona State: 7 by 37.1
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins76.7 · Games = 3 · +39.7 vs Losses
Losses37 · Games = 7 · -39.7 vs Wins
First Half44 · Games = 5 · -9.8 vs Second Half
Second Half53.8 · Games = 5 · +9.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Iowa State
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/23 | vs Arizona State | L 17-42 | — | 7 | 39 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ West Virginia | L 22-29 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Arizona | L 17-52 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Iowa State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-17 | — | 8 | 128 | 16 | 16 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ TCU | L 21-35 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Sun 9/28 | vs BYU | L 21-24 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 9/21 | vs Wyoming | W 37-20 | — | 1 | 47 | 47 | 47 | 1 | 47 |
| Fri 9/12 | @ Houston | L 20-36 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Delaware | W 31-7 | — | 4 | 55 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Georgia Tech | L 20-27 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2024
Opening stop
- 2
Colorado
2025
Final stop
Season Progression
20242025
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 Regular Season | Tulsa | 588 | 94.5 | 21.4 | — |
| 2025 Regular Season | Colorado | 489 | 77.9 | 21.6 | -99 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
128
Primary metric
128 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
East Carolina
158
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
158 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
South Florida
126
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
BYU
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 74.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2024 Regular Season · Tulsa
588 primary output · 94.5 efficiency · 21.4 usage
67.4
#2
2025 Regular Season · Colorado
61.5
489 primary · 77.9 efficiency · 21.6 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2024 · Rating 0.8561
Mansfield Summit · Arlington, TX
- Committed To
- Tulsa
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2024
Career Facts
2
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,077
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 17 games, and SP opponent-strength context when available. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.