Usage Score
9.2
Player Dossier
2011-2014Iowa
TE • 6'5" • Strongsville, OH, USA
Ray Hamilton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.2
Efficiency
59.1
Consistency
34.7
Season Value
50.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Iowa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ray Hamilton, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Iowa. Ray Hamilton reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Iowa paired 15 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
15.9
Efficiency
59.1
Usage
9.2
Consistency
34.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 51. Unknown: 10. Ball State: 13. Iowa State: 41. Pittsburgh: 10. Purdue: 1. Indiana: 4. Maryland: 4. Northwestern: 11. Illinois: 20. Nebraska: 10
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 3 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 66.7. Ball State: 1 by 86.7. Iowa State: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 1 by 66.7. Purdue: 2 by 3.3. Indiana: 1 by 26.7. Maryland: 1 by 26.7. Northwestern: 1 by 73.3. Illinois: 4 by 33.3. Nebraska: 1 by 66.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tennessee
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/2 | @ Tennessee | L 28-45 | — | 3 | 51 | 17 | 17 | 1 | 31 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Nebraska | L 34-37 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Illinois2+ TD | W 30-14 | — | 4 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 12 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Northwestern | W 48-7 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Maryland | L 31-38 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Indiana | W 45-29 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Purdue | W 24-10 | — | 2 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.50 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Pittsburgh | W 24-20 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Iowa State | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Ball State | W 17-13 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Iowa
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa | 15 | 100 | 6.7 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Iowa | 20 | 50 | 5.4 | 5 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Iowa | 95 | 66.7 | 12.1 | 75 |
| 2014 Postseason | Iowa | 175 | 59.1 | 9.2 | 80 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Iowa | 175 | 59.1 | 9.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51
Primary metric
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
15
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
20
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Iowa State
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Iowa
15 primary output · 100 efficiency · 6.7 usage
54.6
#2
2014 Postseason · Iowa
50.8
175 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 9.2 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Iowa
50.8
175 primary · 59.1 efficiency · 9.2 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8919
Strongsville · Strongsville, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
305
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ray Hamilton quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit