Usage Score
31.1
Player Dossier
2011-2015Iowa
RB • 5'9" • Troy, NY, USA
Jordan Canzeri leans workhorse runner traits and 54 efficiency.
Usage Score
31.1
Efficiency
54
Consistency
62.3
Season Value
61.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Iowa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Canzeri, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Iowa. Jordan Canzeri leans workhorse runner traits and 54 efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Iowa paired 1,192 primary output with 54 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
99.3
Efficiency
54
Usage
31.1
Consistency
62.3
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 20. Unknown: 118. Iowa State: 143. Pittsburgh: 79. North Texas: 121. Wisconsin: 139. Illinois: 271. Northwestern: 20. Minnesota: 34. Purdue: 95. Nebraska: 140. Michigan State: 12
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 7 by 21.9. Unknown: 9 by 85. Iowa State: 25 by 56.1. Pittsburgh: 19 by 42.8. North Texas: 23 by 54.6. Wisconsin: 27 by 51.5. Illinois: 45 by 62.3. Northwestern: 5 by 18.2. Minnesota: 11 by 32.3. Purdue: 13 by 76.1. Nebraska: 17 by 84.3. Michigan State: 2 by 62.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
85 vs Unknown
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Stanford | L 16-45 | 5 | 8 | 1.60 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 2.9 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs Michigan State | L 13-16 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Nebraska100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 28-20 | 17 | 140 | 8.20 | 2 | — | — | 8.2 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Purdue | W 40-20 | 13 | 95 | 7.30 | 1 | — | — | 7.3 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 40-35 | 10 | 31 | 3.10 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3.1 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Northwestern | W 40-10 | 4 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 4 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Illinois100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 29-20 | 43 | 256 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 6.0 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Wisconsin100 rush yards | W 10-6 | 26 | 125 | 4.80 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 5.1 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs North Texas100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 62-16 | 22 | 115 | 5.20 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 5.3 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Pittsburgh2+ TD | W 27-24 | 12 | 49 | 4.10 | 2 | 7 | 30 | 4.2 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Iowa State100 rush yards | W 31-17 | 24 | 124 | 5.20 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 5.7 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | 5 | 28 | 5.60 | 1 | 4 | 90 | 13.1 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Iowa
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Iowa | 142 | 53.2 | 12.8 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa | 142 | 53.2 | 12.8 | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Iowa | 0 | — | — | -142 |
| 2013 Postseason | Iowa | 542 | 59.8 | 11.9 | 542 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Iowa | 542 | 59.8 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Iowa | 617 | 52.6 | 16.8 | 75 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Iowa | 617 | 52.6 | 16.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Iowa | 1,192 | 54 | 31.1 | 575 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Iowa | 1,192 | 54 | 31.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
271
Primary metric
271 scrimmage yards and 71.4 usage.
#2
Tennessee
133
Primary metric
Loss with 133 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
133 scrimmage yards and 28 usage.
#3
Purdue
165
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
165 scrimmage yards and 31.7 usage.
#4
Nebraska
140
Primary metric
Win with 140 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
140 scrimmage yards and 48.6 usage.
#5
Oklahoma
86
Primary metric
Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load.
86 scrimmage yards and 47.5 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Iowa
1,192 primary output · 54 efficiency · 31.1 usage
61.8
#2
2015 Regular Season · Iowa
61.8
1,192 primary · 54 efficiency · 31.1 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Iowa
46.9
617 primary · 52.6 efficiency · 16.8 usage
8
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7667
Troy · Troy, NY
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
2,493
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Canzeri quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit