Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2011-2014Rutgers
Tyler Kroft
TE • 6'6" • Downingtown, PA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Tyler Kroft reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.6
Consistency
66.5
Season Value
50.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers
111213131414
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyler Kroft, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Rutgers. Tyler Kroft reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Rutgers paired 573 primary output with 78.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
26.9
Efficiency
69.6
Usage
15.6
Consistency
66.5
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 22. Unknown: 5. Penn State: 45. Michigan: 42. Ohio State: 17. Nebraska: 18. Wisconsin: 8. Indiana: 44. Michigan State: 40. Maryland: 28
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 1 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 33.3. Penn State: 4 by 75. Michigan: 3 by 93.3. Ohio State: 2 by 56.7. Nebraska: 2 by 60. Wisconsin: 1 by 53.3. Indiana: 4 by 73.3. Michigan State: 3 by 88.9. Maryland: 3 by 62.2
Split Comparison
Wins34 · n=4 · +8.4 vs Losses
Losses25.6 · n=5 · -8.4 vs Wins
First Half26.2 · n=5 · -1.4 vs Second Half
Second Half27.6 · n=5 · +1.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs North Carolina
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/26 | @ North Carolina | W 40-21 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/29 | @ Maryland | W 41-38 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Michigan State | L 3-45 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Indiana | W 45-23 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Wisconsin | L 0-37 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Nebraska | L 24-42 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Ohio State | L 17-56 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Michigan | W 26-24 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 9/14 | vs Penn State | L 10-13 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 59 | 78.4 | 9.2 | 59 |
| 2013 Postseason | Rutgers | 573 | 78.5 | 19.9 | 514 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Rutgers | 573 | 78.5 | 19.9 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Rutgers | 269 | 69.6 | 15.6 | -304 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Rutgers | 269 | 69.6 | 15.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133
Primary metric
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
42
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Michigan State
40
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Rutgers
573 primary output · 78.5 efficiency · 19.9 usage
65
#2
2013 Regular Season · Rutgers
65
573 primary · 78.5 efficiency · 19.9 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Rutgers
50.5
269 primary · 69.6 efficiency · 15.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8367
Downingtown East · Exton, PA
- Committed To
- Rutgers
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
901
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.