Usage Score
12.1
Player Dossier
2011-2015Rutgers
WR • 5'10" • Long Branch, NJ, USA
Miles Shuler reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.1
Efficiency
55.8
Consistency
34
Season Value
42.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Rutgers
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Miles Shuler, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason · Rutgers. Miles Shuler reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Rutgers paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 55.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Rutgers, Northwestern.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
12.4
Efficiency
55.8
Usage
12.1
Consistency
34
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 17. Stanford: 33. Duke: 6. Ball State: 15. Minnesota: 0. Michigan: 9. Iowa: 25. Nebraska: 0. Penn State: -1. Purdue: 0. Wisconsin: 6. Illinois: 39
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 2 by 56.7. Stanford: 2 by 100. Duke: 1 by 40. Ball State: 2 by 50. Michigan: 1 by 60. Iowa: 3 by 55.6. Penn State: 1 by 0. Wisconsin: 1 by 40. Illinois: 2 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Tennessee | L 6-45 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Illinois | W 24-14 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Wisconsin | W 13-7 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Purdue | W 21-14 | — | — | — | 15 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Penn State | W 23-21 | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Nebraska | W 30-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Iowa | L 10-40 | — | 3 | 25 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Michigan | L 0-38 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Minnesota | W 27-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Ball State | W 24-19 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Duke | W 19-10 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Stanford | W 16-6 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 25 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rutgers
2011-2012
Opening stop
Northwestern
2014-2015
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Rutgers | 71 | 71.7 | 7.4 | 71 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Rutgers | 71 | 71.7 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Northwestern | 190 | 53.3 | 14.6 | 119 |
| 2015 Postseason | Northwestern | 149 | 55.8 | 12.1 | -41 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Northwestern | 149 | 55.8 | 12.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39
Primary metric
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Stanford
33
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
33 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Minnesota
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#5
California
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2011 Postseason · Rutgers
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2011 Regular Season · Rutgers
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Northwestern
52.9
190 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 14.6 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.929
Long Branch · Long Branch, NJ
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
410
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Miles Shuler quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit