Player Stats

Adam Hine College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
772
Rushing yards
704
Receiving yards
68
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonBYU00000-
2012 Regular SeasonBYU00000-
2013 PostseasonBYU12550032.2
2013 Regular SeasonBYU1222921910132.2
2014 PostseasonBYU1111011039.3
2014 Regular SeasonBYU1118615432439.3
2015 Regular SeasonBYU734132615257.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

BYU paired 341 primary output with 41.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 41.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2015 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCLA

Loss driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · BYU

Games

7

Scrimmage Yards / G

48.7

Efficiency

41.8

Usage

18.6

Consistency

34.8

Best Game by takeover score

UCLA

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 37. Boise State: 95. UCLA: 157. Michigan: 38. San José State: 9. Missouri: 7. Utah State: -2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 4 by 88.5. Boise State: 20 by 50.4. UCLA: 25 by 66.7. Michigan: 9 by 43.4. San José State: 3 by 31.3. Missouri: 6 by 12.2. Utah State: 1 by 0

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins34.8 · Games = 4 · -32.6 vs Losses
Losses67.3 · Games = 3 · +32.6 vs Wins