Player Stats

Remi Watson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,607
Rushing yards
1,444
Receiving yards
163
Touchdowns
19

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonMarshall00000-
2012 Regular SeasonMarshall1146538085755.6
2013 PostseasonMarshall942420024.7
2013 Regular SeasonMarshall979781024.7
2014 PostseasonMarshall1325250059.3
2014 Regular SeasonMarshall1354352122759.3
2015 Regular SeasonMarshall945339855560.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Marshall paired 453 primary output with 53.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 53.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Win with 113 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Marshall

Games

9

Scrimmage Yards / G

50.3

Efficiency

53.8

Usage

16.7

Consistency

60.6

Best Game by takeover score

North Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 33. Ohio: 7. Southern Miss: 18. Florida Atlantic: 66. North Texas: 113. Charlotte: 47. Middle Tennessee: 25. Florida International: 97. Western Kentucky: 47

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 6 by 57.3. Ohio: 1 by 72.9. Southern Miss: 8 by 23.4. Florida Atlantic: 11 by 62.5. North Texas: 19 by 55.3. Charlotte: 13 by 35.9. Middle Tennessee: 5 by 52.1. Florida International: 11 by 86.7. Western Kentucky: 11 by 37.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins62.3 · Games = 6 · +36 vs Losses
Losses26.3 · Games = 3 · -36 vs Wins