Usage Score
41
Player Dossier
2011-2013Penn State
WR • 6'3" • Southfield, MI, USA
Allen Robinson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
41
Efficiency
93.2
Consistency
80.4
Season Value
77.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Allen Robinson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season · Penn State. Allen Robinson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Penn State paired 1,432 primary output with 93.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 93.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
119.3
Efficiency
93.2
Usage
41
Consistency
80.4
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Syracuse: 133. Eastern Michigan: 129. UCF: 143. Kent State: 43. Indiana: 173. Michigan: 84. Ohio State: 173. Illinois: 165. Minnesota: 63. Purdue: 98. Nebraska: 106. Wisconsin: 122
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Syracuse: 7 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 7 by 100. UCF: 9 by 100. Kent State: 3 by 95.6. Indiana: 12 by 96.1. Michigan: 5 by 100. Ohio State: 12 by 96.1. Illinois: 11 by 100. Minnesota: 7 by 60. Purdue: 8 by 81.7. Nebraska: 8 by 88.3. Wisconsin: 8 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | @ Wisconsin100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 8 | 122 | 13.8 | 15.30 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs Nebraska100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-23 | — | 8 | 106 | 12.6 | 13.30 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 11/16 | vs PurdueHigh volume | W 45-21 | — | 8 | 98 | 11.9 | 12.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Minnesota | L 10-24 | — | 7 | 63 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Illinois100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-17 | — | 11 | 165 | 14.9 | 15 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 10/27 | @ Ohio State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-63 | — | 12 | 173 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Michigan | W 43-40 | — | 5 | 84 | 13 | 16.80 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 10/5 | @ Indiana100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-44 | — | 12 | 173 | 14.1 | 14.40 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Kent State | W 34-0 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs UCF100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-34 | — | 9 | 143 | 15.9 | 15.90 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Eastern Michigan100 receiving yards | W 45-7 | — | 7 | 129 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Syracuse100 receiving yards | W 23-17 | — | 7 | 133 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 51 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Penn State | 29 | 64.4 | 6.2 | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Penn State | 1,018 | 78.5 | 28.9 | 989 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Penn State | 1,432 | 93.2 | 41 | 414 |
#1 Featured game
Ohio State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
173
Primary metric
173 receiving yards with a 96.1 efficiency score.
#2
Illinois
165
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
197
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Indiana
173
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 96.1 efficiency score.
#5
UCF
143
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2013 Regular Season · Penn State
1,432 primary output · 93.2 efficiency · 41 usage
77.9
#2
2012 Regular Season · Penn State
61.8
1,018 primary · 78.5 efficiency · 28.9 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · Penn State
41.1
29 primary · 64.4 efficiency · 6.2 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8383
St. Mary's · Orchard Lake, MI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
2,479
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Allen Robinson quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit