Player Stats

Bill Belton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,061
Rushing yards
1,652
Receiving yards
409
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 PostseasonPenn State438380028.6
2011 Regular SeasonPenn State427270028.6
2012 Regular SeasonPenn State730825850442.7
2013 Regular SeasonPenn State11961803158773.4
2014 PostseasonPenn State1322814056.7
2014 Regular SeasonPenn State13705518187756.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season

Penn State paired 961 primary output with 55.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Indiana

Win with 137 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Postseason · Penn State

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

55.9

Efficiency

42.3

Usage

21.1

Consistency

48.5

Best Game by takeover score

Indiana

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Boston College: 22. UCF: 29. Akron: 85. Rutgers: 88. Massachusetts: 76. Northwestern: 40. Michigan: 95. Ohio State: 13. Maryland: 14. Indiana: 137. Temple: 98. Illinois: 15. Michigan State: 15

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boston College: 6 by 31.9. UCF: 11 by 21. Akron: 13 by 52.2. Rutgers: 19 by 34.3. Massachusetts: 7 by 95.2. Northwestern: 13 by 32.4. Michigan: 18 by 52.8. Ohio State: 11 by 10.5. Maryland: 8 by 18.2. Indiana: 16 by 85.7. Temple: 20 by 50.7. Illinois: 7 by 15.2. Michigan State: 2 by 50

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins76.4 · Games = 7 · +44.4 vs Losses
Losses32 · Games = 6 · -44.4 vs Wins