Usage / Role
56%
Regular offensive contributor
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTSA
RB • 5'10" • San Antonio, TX, USA
David Glasco II leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.6 efficiency.
Usage / Role
56%
Regular offensive contributor
Impact Production
42
Developing production for a back
Reliability
40
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
58
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
David Glasco II built his college career from 2012 through 2014 as a running back from San Antonio, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of David Glasco II's career was his backfield work:...
Read the storyDavid Glasco II, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Regular Season · UTSA. David Glasco II leans balanced backfield option traits and 36.6 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 609 | 537 | 72 | 6 | 71.2 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 10 | 508 | 496 | 12 | 6 | 58.6 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 588 | 570 | 18 | 5 | 61.6 |
Related Context
David Glasco II played RB for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, David Glasco II recorded 1,603 rushing yards, 102 receiving yards, and 17 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Regular Season
UTSA paired 609 primary output with 50.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 36.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Southern Miss
Win with 111 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
49
Efficiency
36.6
Usage
23.6
Consistency
45.6
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 81. Arizona: 35. Oklahoma State: 27. Florida Atlantic: 85. New Mexico: 28. Florida International: 4. Louisiana Tech: 14. UTEP: 16. Rice: 58. Southern Miss: 111. Western Kentucky: 30. North Texas: 99
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Houston: 25 by 33.8. Arizona: 12 by 30.4. Oklahoma State: 9 by 31.3. Florida Atlantic: 18 by 49.2. New Mexico: 11 by 26.5. Florida International: 9 by 4.6. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 12.1. UTEP: 5 by 33.3. Rice: 11 by 56. Southern Miss: 17 by 69.4. Western Kentucky: 13 by 24. North Texas: 15 by 68.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Best efficiency game
69.4 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs North Texas | W 34-27 | 15 | 99 | 6.60 | 1 | — | — | 6.6 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | 13 | 30 | 2.30 | 0 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Southern Miss100 rush yards | W 12-10 | 16 | 108 | 6.80 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 6.5 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 7-17 | 9 | 49 | 5.40 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5.3 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UTEP | L 0-34 | 5 | 16 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-27 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 1.4 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida International | W 16-13 | 9 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | — | — | 0.4 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs New Mexico | L 9-21 | 11 | 28 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 37-41 | 18 | 85 | 4.70 | 1 | — | — | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-43 | 9 | 27 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Arizona | L 23-26 | 12 | 35 | 2.90 | 1 | — | — | 2.9 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Houston2+ TD | W 27-7 | 25 | 81 | 3.20 | 2 | — | — | 3.2 |
Player Story
David Glasco II built his college career from 2012 through 2014 as a running back from San Antonio, TX wearing No. 11, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of David Glasco II's career was his backfield work: 1,603 rushing yards, 356 carries, 15 rushing touchdowns, and 102 receiving yards across 34 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2012 with UTSA. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 102 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 34 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UTSA.
The arc is straightforward: David Glasco II moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 609 | 50.5 | 19.8 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 508 | 46.3 | 17.4 | -101 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 588 | 36.6 | 23.6 | 80 |
#1 Featured game
@ Tulsa
Week 10 · W 34-15 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
135
Scrimmage Yards
89 takeover
135 scrimmage yards and 39.6 usage.
#2
vs Southern Miss
Week 12 · W 12-10 · Conference game
111
Scrimmage Yards
82.2 takeover
Win with 111 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
111 scrimmage yards and 27 usage.
#3
@ South Alabama
Week 1 · W 33-31
73
Scrimmage Yards
81.8 takeover
Win with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73 scrimmage yards and 25 usage.
#4
vs North Texas
Week 14 · W 34-27 · Conference game
99
Scrimmage Yards
80.7 takeover
Win with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
99 scrimmage yards and 29.4 usage.
#5
@ Rice
Week 7 · L 14-34
73
Scrimmage Yards
77.5 takeover
Loss with 73 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
73 scrimmage yards and 28.9 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
609 primary output · 50.5 efficiency · 19.8 usage
71.2
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
61.6
588 primary · 36.6 efficiency · 23.6 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
58.6
508 primary · 46.3 efficiency · 17.4 usage
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.