Usage / Role
20%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2012-2014UTSA
RB • 5'6" • San Antonio, TX, USA
Brandon Armstrong leans balanced backfield option traits and 41 efficiency.
Usage / Role
20%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
22
Developing production for a back
Reliability
13
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
42
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA
Snapshot
Player Story
Brandon Armstrong built his college career from 2012 through 2014 as a running back from San Antonio, TX wearing No. 5, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Brandon Armstrong's career was his backfield work:...
Read the storyBrandon Armstrong, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · UTSA. Brandon Armstrong leans balanced backfield option traits and 41 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 10 | 180 | 97 | 83 | 1 | 38.7 |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 12 | 423 | 251 | 172 | 5 | 59 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 11 | 305 | 167 | 138 | 1 | 42.9 |
Related Context
Brandon Armstrong played RB for UTSA. Across 3 tracked seasons, Brandon Armstrong recorded 515 rushing yards, 393 receiving yards, and 7 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with UTSA.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
UTSA paired 423 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 41 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
27.7
Efficiency
41
Usage
9.9
Consistency
30.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 37. Oklahoma State: 15. Florida Atlantic: 13. New Mexico: -1. Florida International: 85. Louisiana Tech: -5. UTEP: 7. Rice: 20. Southern Miss: 7. Western Kentucky: 33. North Texas: 94
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 7 by 53.3. Oklahoma State: 6 by 21.7. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 16.7. New Mexico: 2 by 0. Florida International: 6 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 0. UTEP: 5 by 14.6. Rice: 4 by 58.3. Southern Miss: 1 by 58.3. Western Kentucky: 6 by 42.9. North Texas: 10 by 85.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs North Texas | W 34-27 | 9 | 67 | 7.40 | 1 | 1 | 27 | 9.4 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Western Kentucky | L 7-45 | 5 | 16 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 5.5 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Southern Miss | W 12-10 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 7-17 | 3 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs UTEP | L 0-34 | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | — | — | 1.4 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Louisiana Tech | L 20-27 | 4 | -5 | -1.30 | 0 | — | — | -1.3 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Florida International | W 16-13 | 3 | 40 | 13.30 | 0 | 3 | 45 | 14.2 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs New Mexico | L 9-21 | 2 | -1 | -0.50 | 0 | — | — | -0.5 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Florida Atlantic | L 37-41 | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 3.3 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Oklahoma State | L 13-43 | 5 | 9 | 1.80 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2.5 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Arizona | L 23-26 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 5.3 |
Player Story
Brandon Armstrong built his college career from 2012 through 2014 as a running back from San Antonio, TX wearing No. 5, spending time with UTSA. The clearest part of Brandon Armstrong's career was his backfield work: 515 rushing yards, 99 carries, 4 rushing touchdowns, and 393 receiving yards across 33 career games in the available record. His career also includes 393 receiving yards and 164 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Brandon Armstrong's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTSA
2012-2014
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 Regular Season | UTSA | 180 | 43.1 | 7.7 | — |
| 2013 Regular Season | UTSA | 423 | 67.8 | 7.5 | 243 |
| 2014 Regular Season | UTSA | 305 | 41 | 9.9 | -118 |
#1 Featured game
vs Tulane
Week 11 · W 10-7 · Conference game
Win with 98 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
98
Scrimmage Yards
85.7 takeover
98 scrimmage yards and 25.6 usage.
#2
vs North Texas
Week 14 · W 34-27 · Conference game
94
Scrimmage Yards
80.6 takeover
Win with 94 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
94 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
#3
vs UAB
Week 9 · W 52-31 · Conference game
105
Scrimmage Yards
74.8 takeover
Win with 105 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
105 scrimmage yards and 8.5 usage.
#4
vs Florida International
Week 7 · W 16-13 · Conference game
85
Scrimmage Yards
73.2 takeover
Win with 85 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
85 scrimmage yards and 10.2 usage.
#5
vs McNeese
Week 11 · W 31-24
36
Scrimmage Yards
63.9 takeover
Win with 36 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
36 scrimmage yards and 3.6 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · UTSA
423 primary output · 67.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
59
#2
2014 Regular Season · UTSA
42.9
305 primary · 41 efficiency · 9.9 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · UTSA
38.7
180 primary · 43.1 efficiency · 7.7 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.