Usage / Role
5%
Rotational offensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2011-2015Texas Tech
Brad Pearson
WR • 6'2" • Lubbock, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Brad Pearson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Impact Production
14
Developing production for a receiver
lowelite
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
19
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Texas Tech
111213141515
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Stephen F. Austin
Brad Pearson, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Texas Tech. Brad Pearson reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Receiving yards
- 136
- Receptions
- 15
Quick Answers
Brad Pearson quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Texas Tech · WR
- Career Receiving Yards
- 136
- Tracked sample
- 5 unique seasons · 6 entries · 10 games
- Best season
- 2013 Regular Season · Texas Tech
- Top game
- Stephen F. Austin
- Latest roster
- No. 83 · Class 2015
- 2015 Receiving yards rank
- 47 receiving yards · WR 725th (top 76%) · Big 12 107th (top 66%) · National 1,232nd (top 64%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 2 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 57.2 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 4 | 6 | 38 | 0 | 56.9 |
| 2015 Postseason | Texas Tech | 4 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 53.8 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 4 | 4 | 29 | 0 | 53.8 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Brad Pearson
Brad Pearson played WR for Texas Tech. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brad Pearson recorded 136 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Texas Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Texas Tech paired 51 primary output with 56.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 55 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
11.8
Efficiency
55
Usage
4.9
Consistency
51.7
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 18. Oklahoma: 26. West Virginia: 5. Texas: -2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. LSU: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 2 by 86.7. West Virginia: 1 by 33.3. Texas: 1 by 0
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins-2 · Games = 1 · -18.3 vs Losses
Losses16.3 · Games = 3 · +18.3 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs LSU
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2011-2015
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
201120122013201420152015
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 51 | 56.7 | 5.9 | 51 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 38 | 52.2 | 5.6 | -13 |
| 2015 Postseason | Texas Tech | 47 | 55 | 4.9 | 9 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 47 | 55 | 4.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
vs Stephen F. Austin
Week 2 · W 61-13
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
49
Receiving Yards
77.1 takeover
49 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Oklahoma
Week 8 · L 27-63 · Conference game
26
Receiving Yards
69.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
26 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#3
@ Iowa State
Week 13 · W 34-31 · Conference game
12
Receiving Yards
64.8 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
vs LSU
Week 1 · L 27-56 · Postseason
18
Receiving Yards
60.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Oklahoma
Week 12 · L 30-42 · Conference game
11
Receiving Yards
59.1 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · Texas Tech
51 primary output · 56.7 efficiency · 5.9 usage
57.2
#2
2014 Regular Season · Texas Tech
56.9
38 primary · 52.2 efficiency · 5.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Texas Tech
53.8
47 primary · 55 efficiency · 4.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Brad Pearson
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.