Usage Score
21.7
Player Dossier
2011-2014Notre Dame
DaVaris Daniels
WR • 6'1" • Vernon Hills, IL, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
DaVaris Daniels reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.2
Consistency
50.1
Season Value
64.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Notre Dame
111212131314
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DaVaris Daniels, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Notre Dame. DaVaris Daniels reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Notre Dame paired 745 primary output with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2014 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Notre Dame
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
57.3
Efficiency
85.2
Usage
21.7
Consistency
50.1
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rutgers: 25. Temple: 69. Michigan: 63. Purdue: 167. Michigan State: 6. Oklahoma: 13. Arizona State: 67. USC: 44. Air Force: 34. Navy: 33. Pittsburgh: 38. BYU: 107. Stanford: 79
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rutgers: 3 by 55.6. Temple: 3 by 100. Michigan: 6 by 70. Purdue: 8 by 100. Michigan State: 3 by 13.3. Oklahoma: 1 by 86.7. Arizona State: 4 by 100. USC: 3 by 97.8. Air Force: 2 by 100. Navy: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 3 by 84.4. BYU: 6 by 100. Stanford: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins61.3 · n=9 · +13.1 vs Losses
Losses48.3 · n=4 · -13.1 vs Wins
First Half58.6 · n=7 · +2.7 vs Second Half
Second Half55.8 · n=6 · -2.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/28 | vs Rutgers | W 29-16 | — | 3 | 25 | 4.8 | 8.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Stanford | L 20-27 | — | 5 | 79 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs BYU100 receiving yards | W 23-13 | — | 6 | 107 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 61 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Pittsburgh | L 21-28 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Navy | W 38-34 | — | 2 | 33 | 11.7 | 16.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Air Force | W 45-10 | — | 2 | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs USC | W 14-10 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Arizona State | W 37-34 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Oklahoma | L 21-35 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Michigan State | W 17-13 | — | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Purdue100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-24 | — | 8 | 167 | 20.9 | 20.90 | 2 | 82 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ Michigan | L 30-41 | — | 6 | 63 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Temple2+ TD | W 28-6 | — | 3 | 69 | 23 | 23 | 2 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
201120122012201320132014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Notre Dame | 490 | 91.6 | 18.2 | 490 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 490 | 91.6 | 18.2 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Notre Dame | 745 | 85.2 | 21.7 | 255 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 745 | 85.2 | 21.7 | 0 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | -745 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Purdue
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
167
Primary metric
167 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Alabama
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
107
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 81.9 efficiency score.
#5
Stanford
79
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
79 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Notre Dame
745 primary output · 85.2 efficiency · 21.7 usage
64.3
#2
2013 Regular Season · Notre Dame
64.3
745 primary · 85.2 efficiency · 21.7 usage
#3
2012 Postseason · Notre Dame
60.1
490 primary · 91.6 efficiency · 18.2 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.9545
Vernon Hills · Vernon Hills, IL
- Committed To
- Notre Dame
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,235
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.