Usage / Role
74%
Major offensive role
Player Dossier
2011-2013Notre Dame
RB • 6'1" • Stockton, CA, USA
George Atkinson III leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.1 efficiency.
Usage / Role
74%
Major offensive role
Impact Production
38
Developing production for a back
Reliability
24
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
61
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Snapshot
Player Story
George Atkinson III built his college career from 2011 through 2013 as a running back from Stockton, CA wearing No. 4, spending time with Notre Dame. The clearest part of George Atkinson III's career was his...
Read the storyGeorge Atkinson III, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2013 Regular Season · Notre Dame. George Atkinson III leans balanced backfield option traits and 58.1 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Notre Dame | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.8 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 11 | 37 | 27 | 10 | 4 | 14.8 |
| 2012 Postseason | Notre Dame | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40.3 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 365 | 361 | 4 | 5 | 40.3 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 12 | 606 | 555 | 51 | 3 | 67.1 |
Related Context
George Atkinson III played RB for Notre Dame. Across 3 tracked seasons, George Atkinson III recorded 943 rushing yards, 65 receiving yards, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2013 with Notre Dame.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 606 primary output with 58.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2013 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Loss with 143 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
50.5
Efficiency
58.1
Usage
17.7
Consistency
59.7
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 45. Michigan: 53. Purdue: 38. Michigan State: 40. Oklahoma: 143. Arizona State: 54. USC: 40. Air Force: 19. Navy: 74. Pittsburgh: 57. BYU: 42. Stanford: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 9 by 47.4. Michigan: 6 by 83.1. Purdue: 6 by 60.1. Michigan State: 8 by 44.8. Oklahoma: 15 by 89.7. Arizona State: 18 by 31.3. USC: 8 by 52.1. Air Force: 7 by 30.1. Navy: 7 by 94. Pittsburgh: 6 by 89.6. BYU: 6 by 72.9. Stanford: 4 by 2.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
94 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/1 | @ Stanford | L 20-27 | 4 | 1 | 0.30 | 0 | — | — | 0.3 |
| Sat 11/23 | vs BYU | W 23-13 | 6 | 42 | 7 | 0 | — | — | 7 |
| Sun 11/10 | @ Pittsburgh | L 21-28 | 6 | 57 | 9.50 | 0 | — | — | 9.5 |
| Sat 11/2 | vs Navy | W 38-34 | 7 | 74 | 10.60 | 1 | — | — | 10.6 |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Air Force | W 45-10 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.7 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs USC | W 14-10 | 8 | 40 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 10/5 | vs Arizona State | W 37-34 | 18 | 54 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 9/28 | vs Oklahoma100 rush yards | L 21-35 | 14 | 148 | 10.60 | 1 | 1 | -5 | 9.5 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs Michigan State | W 17-13 | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 |
| Sun 9/15 | @ Purdue | W 31-24 | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 6.3 |
| Sun 9/8 | @ Michigan | L 30-41 | 5 | 37 | 7.40 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 8.8 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Temple | W 28-6 | 8 | 34 | 4.30 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 5 |
Player Story
George Atkinson III built his college career from 2011 through 2013 as a running back from Stockton, CA wearing No. 4, spending time with Notre Dame. The clearest part of George Atkinson III's career was his backfield work: 943 rushing yards, 153 carries, 10 rushing touchdowns, and 65 receiving yards across 35 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2013 with Notre Dame. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 65 receiving yards and 2,136 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 35 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Notre Dame.
The arc is straightforward: George Atkinson III moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Postseason | Notre Dame | 37 | 42.4 | 1.7 | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 37 | 42.4 | 1.7 | 0 |
| 2012 Postseason | Notre Dame | 365 | 50.4 | 8 | 328 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 365 | 50.4 | 8 | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 606 | 58.1 | 17.7 | 241 |
#1 Featured game
vs Oklahoma
Week 5 · L 21-35
Loss with 143 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
143
Scrimmage Yards
96.6 takeover
143 scrimmage yards and 40.5 usage.
#2
vs Miami
Week 6 · W 41-3
123
Scrimmage Yards
80.3 takeover
Win with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
123 scrimmage yards and 14.3 usage.
#3
@ Navy
Week 1 · W 50-10 · Conference game
99
Scrimmage Yards
72.6 takeover
Win with 99 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
99 scrimmage yards and 14.5 usage.
#4
vs Navy
Week 10 · W 38-34 · Conference game
74
Scrimmage Yards
63.4 takeover
Win with 74 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
74 scrimmage yards and 15.6 usage.
#5
vs Navy
Week 9 · W 56-14 · Conference game
26
Scrimmage Yards
58.6 takeover
Win with 26 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
26 scrimmage yards and 13 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2013 Regular Season · Notre Dame
606 primary output · 58.1 efficiency · 17.7 usage
67.1
#2
2012 Postseason · Notre Dame
40.3
365 primary · 50.4 efficiency · 8 usage
#3
2012 Regular Season · Notre Dame
40.3
365 primary · 50.4 efficiency · 8 usage
2
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.