Usage Score
33.5
Player Profile
Johnny Manziel
QB • 6'1" • Kerrville, TX, USA
Dual-threat creatorEfficient finisher
Johnny Manziel is a dual-threat creator with 33.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
73.4
Consistency
78.7
Season Value
71.4
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Texas A&M
1112121313
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Primary stop by seasons
- Texas A&M
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Texas A&M
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Johnny Manziel, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason · Texas A&M. Johnny Manziel is a dual-threat creator with 33.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 5,116 primary output with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
2013 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 73.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
374.8
Efficiency
73.4
Usage
33.5
Consistency
78.7
Best Game by takeover score
Duke
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Duke: 455. Rice: 113. Unknown: 462. Alabama: 562. SMU: 346. Arkansas: 320. Ole Miss: 470. Auburn: 502. Vanderbilt: 316. UTEP: 340. Mississippi State: 493. LSU: 278. Missouri: 216
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Duke: 49 by 82.3. Rice: 14 by 76.1. Unknown: 49 by 73.9. Alabama: 53 by 80.1. SMU: 33 by 82.4. Arkansas: 39 by 78.7. Ole Miss: 58 by 77.1. Auburn: 56 by 69.7. Vanderbilt: 39 by 65. UTEP: 31 by 89.3. Mississippi State: 53 by 68.8. LSU: 53 by 52.5. Missouri: 46 by 58.5
Split Comparison
Wins356.6 · n=8 · -32.9 vs Losses
Losses389.5 · n=4 · +32.9 vs Wins
First Half389.7 · n=7 · +32.2 vs Second Half
Second Half357.5 · n=6 · -32.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
89.3 vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/1 | vs Duke300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 52-48 | 30 | 38 | 382 | 78.9 | 4 | 0 | 82.3 | 11 | 73 | 6.60 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 12/1 | @ Missouri | L 21-28 | 24 | 35 | 195 | 68.6 | 1 | 0 | 58.5 | 11 | 21 | 1.90 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/23 | @ LSUDual-threat | L 10-34 | 16 | 41 | 224 | 39.0 | 1 | 2 | 52.5 | 12 | 54 | 4.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/9 | vs Mississippi State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 51-41 | 30 | 39 | 446 | 76.9 | 5 | 3 | 68.8 | 14 | 47 | 3.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 11/3 | vs UTEP3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 57-7 | 16 | 24 | 273 | 66.7 | 4 | 0 | 89.3 | 7 | 67 | 9.60 | 2 | 49 |
| Sat 10/26 | vs Vanderbilt300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 56-24 | 25 | 35 | 305 | 71.4 | 4 | 1 | 65 | 4 | 11 | 2.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Auburn300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 41-45 | 28 | 38 | 454 | 73.7 | 4 | 2 | 69.7 | 18 | 48 | 2.70 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 10/13 | @ Ole Miss300-yard game · Dual-threat | W 41-38 | 31 | 39 | 346 | 79.5 | 0 | 1 | 77.1 | 19 | 124 | 6.50 | 2 | 24 |
| Sat 9/28 | @ ArkansasDual-threat | W 45-33 | 23 | 30 | 261 | 76.7 | 2 | 0 | 78.7 | 9 | 59 | 6.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/21 | vs SMU3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 42-13 | 14 | 21 | 244 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 82.4 | 12 | 102 | 8.50 | 2 | 20 |
| Sat 9/14 | vs Alabama300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 42-49 | 28 | 39 | 464 | 71.8 | 5 | 2 | 80.1 | 14 | 98 | 7 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/7 | vs Unknown300-yard game · 3+ TD | — | 29 | 42 | 426 | 69.0 | 3 | 1 | 73.9 | 7 | 36 | 5.10 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Rice3+ TD | W 52-31 | 6 | 8 | 94 | 75.0 | 3 | 0 | 76.1 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2011-2013
Opening stop
Season Progression
20112012201220132013
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Texas A&M | 5,116 | 76 | 39.5 | 5,116 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 5,116 | 76 | 39.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Texas A&M | 4,873 | 73.4 | 33.5 | -243 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4,873 | 73.4 | 33.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
557
Primary metric
557 total offense with 87.5 efficiency.
#2
Oklahoma
516
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
516 total offense with 80.8 efficiency.
#3
Louisiana Tech
576
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
576 total offense with 81.9 efficiency.
#4
Alabama
562
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
562 total offense with 80.1 efficiency.
#5
Duke
455
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
455 total offense with 82.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2012 Postseason · Texas A&M
5,116 primary output · 76 efficiency · 39.5 usage
74.1
#2
2012 Regular Season · Texas A&M
74.1
5,116 primary · 76 efficiency · 39.5 usage
#3
2013 Postseason · Texas A&M
71.4
4,873 primary · 73.4 efficiency · 33.5 usage
Milestones
23
250+ passing yards
21
300+ total offense
4
3+ takeover TD games
23
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8769
Tivy · Kerrville, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
9,989
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.