Usage Score
32.7
Player Profile
Jamison Crowder
WR • 5'9" • Monroe, NC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jamison Crowder reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.5
Consistency
70.9
Season Value
65.2
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Duke
11121213131414
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Duke
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Duke
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Jamison Crowder, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason · Duke. Jamison Crowder reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason
Duke paired 1,360 primary output with 75.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2014 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2014 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2014 Postseason · Duke
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
80.3
Efficiency
75.5
Usage
32.7
Consistency
70.9
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 102. Unknown: 93. Troy: 70. Kansas: 14. Tulane: 119. Miami: 47. Georgia Tech: 29. Virginia: 99. Pittsburgh: 165. Syracuse: 58. Virginia Tech: 73. North Carolina: 73. Wake Forest: 102
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 7 by 97.1. Unknown: 7 by 88.6. Troy: 7 by 66.7. Kansas: 2 by 46.7. Tulane: 6 by 100. Miami: 7 by 44.8. Georgia Tech: 3 by 64.4. Virginia: 8 by 82.5. Pittsburgh: 9 by 100. Syracuse: 9 by 43. Virginia Tech: 6 by 81.1. North Carolina: 6 by 81.1. Wake Forest: 8 by 85
Split Comparison
Wins82 · n=8 · +8.3 vs Losses
Losses73.8 · n=4 · -8.3 vs Wins
First Half67.7 · n=7 · -27.3 vs Second Half
Second Half95 · n=6 · +27.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
100 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | vs Arizona State100 receiving yards | L 31-36 | — | 7 | 102 | 13.1 | 14.60 | 0 | 43 |
| Sun 11/30 | vs Wake Forest100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-21 | — | 8 | 102 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 1 | 52 |
| Fri 11/21 | vs North Carolina | L 20-45 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Virginia Tech | L 16-17 | — | 6 | 73 | 12.2 | 12.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ SyracuseHigh volume | W 27-10 | — | 9 | 58 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | W 51-48 | — | 9 | 165 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 2 | 45 |
| Sat 10/18 | vs VirginiaHigh volume | W 20-13 | — | 8 | 99 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Georgia Tech | W 31-25 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Miami | L 10-22 | — | 7 | 47 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards | W 47-13 | — | 6 | 119 | 19.8 | 19.80 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Kansas | W 41-3 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Troy | W 34-17 | — | 7 | 70 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 93 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2011-2014
Opening stop
Season Progression
2011201220122013201320142014
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 Regular Season | Duke | 163 | 54.5 | 8.4 | — |
| 2012 Postseason | Duke | 1,074 | 72.3 | 21.5 | 911 |
| 2012 Regular Season | Duke | 1,074 | 72.3 | 21.5 | 0 |
| 2013 Postseason | Duke | 1,360 | 75.6 | 37.3 | 286 |
| 2013 Regular Season | Duke | 1,360 | 75.6 | 37.3 | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | Duke | 1,044 | 75.5 | 32.7 | -316 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Duke | 1,044 | 75.5 | 32.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
165
Primary metric
165 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas A&M
163
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
163 receiving yards with a 90.6 efficiency score.
#3
Troy
149
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami
203
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
203 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Pittsburgh
141
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2013 Postseason · Duke
1,360 primary output · 75.6 efficiency · 37.3 usage
71
#2
2013 Regular Season · Duke
71
1,360 primary · 75.6 efficiency · 37.3 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Duke
65.2
1,044 primary · 75.5 efficiency · 32.7 usage
Milestones
16
100+ receiving yards
13
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2011 · Rating 0.8358
Monroe · Monroe, NC
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2011
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,641
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.