Player Stats

Justus Pickett College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
670
Rushing yards
480
Receiving yards
190
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2011 Regular SeasonMaryland1232327449256.3
2012 Regular SeasonMaryland11280142138453.1
2013 Regular SeasonTennessee00000-
2014 Regular SeasonTennessee667643024.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season

Maryland paired 323 primary output with 35.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2014 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 23.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2014 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Maryland, Tennessee.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Chattanooga

Win with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2014 Regular Season · Tennessee

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

11.2

Efficiency

23.4

Usage

6.1

Consistency

37.8

Best Game by takeover score

Chattanooga

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 11. Oklahoma: 1. Georgia: 0. Chattanooga: 27. Ole Miss: 3. Kentucky: 25

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 4 by 28.6. Oklahoma: 1 by 10.4. Chattanooga: 10 by 28.1. Ole Miss: 2 by 6.3. Kentucky: 6 by 43.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins21 · Games = 3 · +19.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 3 · -19.7 vs Wins