Player Stats

Storm Barrs-Woods College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,768
Rushing yards
2,674
Receiving yards
1,094
Touchdowns
27

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 PostseasonOregon State1214011822280.9
2012 Regular SeasonOregon State121,1138222911180.9
2013 PostseasonOregon State1112810721167
2013 Regular SeasonOregon State11789370419667
2014 Regular SeasonOregon State10945766179670.6
2015 Regular SeasonOregon State11653491162150.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason

Oregon State paired 1,253 primary output with 52.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2015 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 45.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2015 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: San José State

Win with 181 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2015 Regular Season · Oregon State

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

59.4

Efficiency

45.4

Usage

17.2

Consistency

56.6

Best Game by takeover score

San José State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Weber State: 88. Michigan: 13. San José State: 181. Stanford: 94. Arizona: 61. Washington State: 61. Colorado: 1. Utah: 21. UCLA: 87. California: 41. Washington: 5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Weber State: 17 by 47.8. Michigan: 3 by 45.1. San José State: 20 by 87.7. Stanford: 14 by 46.2. Arizona: 10 by 67.1. Washington State: 12 by 41.3. Colorado: 1 by 10.4. Utah: 9 by 24.3. UCLA: 14 by 64.7. California: 7 by 51.5. Washington: 4 by 13

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins134.5 · Games = 2 · +91.8 vs Losses
Losses42.7 · Games = 9 · -91.8 vs Wins