Player Stats

Odell Beckham Jr. College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
2,340
Receptions
143
Touchdowns
14

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2011 PostseasonLSU13538064.4
2011 Regular SeasonLSU1336437264.4
2012 PostseasonLSU13340067.3
2012 Regular SeasonLSU1340673467.3
2013 PostseasonLSU13235087.4
2013 Regular SeasonLSU13571,117887.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2013 Postseason

LSU paired 1,152 primary output with 95 efficiency.

Supporting note

2013 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 95 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2013 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Furman

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2013 Postseason · LSU

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

88.6

Efficiency

95

Usage

29.2

Consistency

57.4

Best Game by takeover score

Furman

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 35. TCU: 118. UAB: 136. Kent State: 76. Auburn: 59. Georgia: 118. Mississippi State: 179. Florida: 47. Ole Miss: 72. Furman: 204. Alabama: 42. Texas A&M: 50. Arkansas: 16

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 2 by 100. TCU: 5 by 100. UAB: 5 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 100. Auburn: 5 by 78.7. Georgia: 6 by 100. Mississippi State: 9 by 100. Florida: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 5 by 96. Furman: 6 by 100. Alabama: 3 by 93.3. Texas A&M: 5 by 66.7. Arkansas: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins92 · Games = 10 · +14.7 vs Losses
Losses77.3 · Games = 3 · -14.7 vs Wins